By Matt Chaney
A teen football player dies suddenly in America, for reasons unrelated to collisions on the field, and the postmortem investigation produces more questions than answers—particularly whether the stressful sport contributed mortally.
And so it goes for too many fatal cases of active football players, mostly juveniles, with the game’s possible link neither verified nor nullified because of two prime areas of limitation:
First, the reputedly “deficient” state of autopsy in America, especially for children, as part of the death-investigations system that a National Academy of Sciences report characterizes as “fragmented” and “hodgepodge.”
And, secondly, the equally challenged research field of football fatalities, presently funded by game organizations and led by two men lacking medical doctorates and certifications, Fred Mueller and Bob Colgate, a professor and a sport administrator, respectively, who largely troll news reports for gathering incomplete data.
“This goes back to medicine’s still being more of an art than a science,” says retired epidemiologist Charles Yesalis, ScD, an expert and author on health issues of athletics, in a telephone interview.
Football’s mortality rate remains incalculable, despite those longstanding Mueller-Colgate statistics widely cited as epidemiology, including by the CDC.
Holes in death investigations are “known for years,” Yesalis says. “You have the problems articulated (by the NAS), but it goes beyond that. It’s often based on whether an autopsy is done. And even if an autopsy is performed on the athlete, there are a lot of times that it’s just not nailed down, particularly, regarding what’s the cause of death and the like. So there’s that issue.”
Meanwhile, the researchers aiming to quantify football’s risk and casualty face their own obstacles.
Beyond the few cases of collision fatalities tied directly to the sport, injury researchers typically rely on minimal data for judging whether a case was “indirectly” game-related, such as a cardiac death.
News texts, particularly the portion posted in online databases, certainly report only a fraction of severe football casualties, although it’s unknown how large or small the margin.
Anecdotal information and subjectivity can influence the record-keeping process, like coaches’ quotes and other bits from news. In many cardiac cases that kill players, grieving parents declare football was not a factor; some families refuse to cooperate with researchers.
For player deaths involving autopsy, researchers Mueller and Colgate value official rulings, but local coroners or medical examiners, elected to the job in many jurisdictions, often do not go far in probing cause or link to football. Many coroners and MEs are incapable themselves and no specialists are enlisted who could shed light.
“You really have to start digging through the medical charts,” Yesalis suggests for strengthening a Mueller-Colgate study, although “the variability of (medical records) is scary when it comes to producing really solid research.”
“All this variability, of how the medical record is written, how it is accessed or not by the researchers, and whether it’s clear that this event was precipitated and related to some sport activity—football, track and field, whatever—anybody who thinks the process is precise is very naïve and hasn’t done a lot of work with medical records, examining them for research purposes.”
This review of 35 players who died during 2012—see list of annotated cases below—demonstrates the problem: Determining death risk and casualty in vast American football remains a lofty goal, mere talk for the foreseeable future, despite contemporary clamor for accurate injury reporting as part of a “safer” game.
Indeed, Mueller and Colgate, supported by football and published under auspices of Mueller’s National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research (NCCSIR) at UNC-Chapel Hill, qualify merely 15 of these fatalities as game-related for their 2012 report.
Central focus here is the sample of 20 deceased football players missed by Mueller and Colgate for 2012. The review makes no scientific claim beyond the raw data that comprise these news reports. No follow-up is performed on any case, keeping the information in correlate with the generic, brief cases presented by Mueller and Colgate, relying themselves on data culled almost strictly from published news.
Heart problems constitute the leading cause in the sample 20 cases that also include deaths of blood clots, diabetic seizure and football impacts. The sampling from Google banks does not include other sudden deaths of active players available in news, nor painkiller overdoses and suicides of active players that medical experts often suspect to be game-related.
Football Cardiac Deaths Numerous, Underreported
Many medical authorities believe death rates of sports are higher than reported tallies, and in the United States tackle football is chief for their concern, among organized games offered by municipalities, schools and colleges.
As crisis strikes American football, once again for inherent brutality, the modern model for advocacy counter-argument, or the messages of writers proclaiming the game safe as most activities for youths, and of professors who rebuke accumulating research on brain risk and damage, do not impress authorities like Dr. Robert D. Stevens, a critical-care neurologist at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore.
“I have a son who is 12, and I’m very grateful he doesn’t want to play football,” Stevens tells The Chicago Sun-Times. “I don’t think we know enough to know we aren’t exposing our kids to harm.”
Yesalis concurs, himself a doctoral graduate of the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, “If I had a son now, there’s no way in hell he’d play football. Wouldn’t happen,” Yesalis says. “I couldn’t permit it as an epidemiologist.”
Neither could Dr. Lewis Margolis, apparently, a pediatrician and epidemiologist at UNC-Chapel Hill, associate professor in the Gillings School of Global Public Health. Margolis argues no further research findings are needed for placing national moratorium on tackle football, a public health menace for brain injuries that needs impact reform to proceed, legally and ethically.
“Football-related head trauma and concussions have raised sentinel alarms, so all who care about children and young adults must not remain silent as this epidemic spreads,” Dr. Margolis writes in a co-authored analysis for InsideHigherEd.com, joined by Gregory Margolis, senior research assistant for the Center of Children and Families at the Brookings Institution. “The principles of informed consent, nonmaleficence, fairness, and community participation demand a halt in the way the game is played, until the risks are better understood and controlled,” they conclude.
At Indiana University, a 2011 study on stroke risk in teen football players found potential causal agents of the sport like “increased hyperventilation, repeated neurological injury, use of anabolic steroids, use of highly caffeinated energy drinks and increased obesity among young players.”
Co-authors Dr. Jared R. Brosch and Dr. Meredith R. Golomb added in a statement: “Organized childhood tackle football in the United States can begin at age 5 years, leading to potentially decades of repeated brain injuries. In addition, the body mass index of the United States pediatric football-playing population continues to increase, so the forces experienced by tackled pediatric players continue to increase. Further work is needed to understand how repeated high-impact large-force trauma from childhood football affects the immature central nervous system.”
Football’s ever-increasing sizes obviously tax other systems of the human body, besides for collisions. When an active player is killed by conditions unrelated to impacts, extensive and careful examination best ensures identifying cause and contributing factors, according to experts on sudden death.
“One of the most frustrating challenges faced by the forensic pathologist is the inability to determine the cause of death in a young person previously thought healthy,” observed Drs. Stephen D. Cohle and B.A. Sampson, co-authors of a 2001 review on negative autopsy or inconclusive investigation.
The co-authors recommend steps including microscopic autopsy, appropriate lab tests, and preservation of specimens such as blood, urine, bile and frozen spleen.
Cardiac deaths are perhaps the deadliest class in football, if largely unproven for the game’s being an impetus.
A suspect cardiac death demands special applications for thorough investigation. “When examining the heart grossly it is important to preserve the anatomic landmarks, (to) section the coronary arteries closely, and recognize lethal abnormalities such as anomalous origin of the coronary arteries,” Cohle and Sampson stated, noting some conditions stand nearly undetectable: “Lethal cardiac diseases with minimal or no anatomic findings include Brugade and Garg’s syndromes, the long QT syndrome, and Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome.”
“Consultation with other experts, including cardiac pathologists, cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and molecular biologists, may be helpful in determining a cause of death.”
A recent British study calls for valid tracking and diagnosis of cardiac mortality in sport populations. Dr. Mary N. Sheppard, author ofAetiology of Sudden Cardiac Death in Sport: A Histopathologist’s Perspective, summarizes: “For the future, it is imperative that pathologists develop standardized methods, pathological criteria for (autopsy) entities, and provide clear reporting in all these cases. However, at the present moment it is essential that the heart of all young individuals dying unexpectedly is examined by an expert cardiac pathologist.”
No national standards govern autopsy in the United States, regarding procedures or personnel certifications, and that affects public record and context on sudden deaths in football.
Among the sample of 20 player fatalities omitted by the Mueller-Colgate report for 2012, the majority bore signs of cardiac arrest or heart attack, and autopsies confirmed those causes in some cases. No coroner or ME extrapolated from available information to conclude football activity was involved, according to news reports online.
But medical consensus holds that physical exertion routinely triggers heart attack and cardiac arrest, with the latter particularly deadly in athletic activities. “As someone told me, sudden cardiac arrest is not rare; surviving it is,” says Laura Friend, of Texas, whose 12-year-old daughter, Sarah, died of SCD while swimming.
“Sudden death in young athletes is often due to some congenital abnormality of the heart that is sometimes asymptomatic, making it a silent killer,” reports Dr. Leigh Vinocur, for HuffingtonPost.com. “A majority of these cases are due to a condition called hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This inherited defect causes the muscular wall of the heart… to be asymmetrically or irregularly enlarged. This interferes with, or prevents, blood from flowing out of the heart when it is beating fast during exercise.”
In addition, genetic heart arrhythmias combined with athletic exertion can send the mitotic organ askew, its electric current, and produce “fast and chaotic beating of the heart” that causes cardiac arrest, notes Vincour, an ER physician in Maryland.
Fatal heart problems occurred last year for American football players ranging from young to middle-aged, with several succumbing in team settings, during game-specific sessions of practice and other training. Football’s official record-keepers missed at least two reported cases, the sudden deaths at official football workouts of Willie Mims, 43, a semipro player in Pennsylvania, and of Temoc Castellanos, 15, a prep in California.
Mims died at team practice during a hot July evening in Wilkes-Barre, collapsing while performing foot drills. A friend, Donnie Jackson-Bey, said doctors believed a pre-existing heart condition caused the death.
Last December, Castellanos, an honors student and Life Scout, collapsed while running during offseason “junior varsity football practice” at Jordan High School, reported BelmontShore.Patch.com. The teen died in a hospital three days later and a “heart abnormality” was suspected, said family friend Yolanda Veronica James.
It is unclear why Mueller and Colgate do not qualify the deaths of Mims and Castellanos as football-related. Perhaps they’re committing further errors at electronic search for casualties, among NCCSIR problems documented at ChaneysBlog in recent years. Researchers at the NCCSIR do not answer questions about their method and results, at least queries from this analyst.
In other cases missing from the UNC statistics for 2012, football players died after falling stricken during personal training or physical activity in the sport’s offseason, including Matt Tautolo, 20, and Anthony Vaeao, 18, both of California, and Austin Lempera, 16, Illinois, and Thomas Allen, 17, in Alabama.
Tautolo collapsed at a campus field of Cerritos College, during a January activity alternatively described as a PE class and the “first day of football orientation” for players. He was pronounced dead within the hour, and autopsy results are unavailable online. Tautolo reportedly had heart surgery in 2008.
Vaeao died in May, as a 6-foot-3, 325-pound lineman bound for college football, after collapsing while playing basketball during a PE class at Mission Hills High School. An autopsy concluded cause of death was HCM, an enlarged heart, with obesity a contributing factor. Vaeao’s size, however, had undoubtedly attracted football recruiters, and he was signed to play for Arizona Western College.
Lempera died in November, when he fell stricken during individual exercise at home. Doctors said heart attack or cardiac arrest apparently killed Lempera, who was a slender, fit defensive lineman his football coach described as “tireless” in training for the team at Lincoln-Way Central High School.
Allen died at Lawrence County High School, of a pickup football game before Christmas break. Allen was throwing and catching a football, with his coach nearby, when he collapsed. He was pronounced died at a hospital, and preliminary exam indicated a heart attack as cause.
Football players training in the offseason died during sleep in 2012, of heart attack and cardiac malfunctions either suspected or confirmed. Mueller and Colgate do not count several cases as game casualties, such as (add links): Tanner Barton, a 6-3, 290-pound lineman for Marian University in Indiana; Cody Stephens, 18, Texas, a 6-9, 305-pound tackle recruit headed to Tarleton State University; Jalen Davis, Tennessee, a receiver and cornerback for Lebanon High School; and David Widzinski, 16, Michigan, a 6-3, 210-pound linebacker and running back for Detroit Catholic High School.
Elsewhere, New York, 14-year-old Tyler Miller died in sleep amid football season, as he both played for Barker/Royalton-Heartland High School and coached in youth football.
Additionally, football players were found unresponsive in dormitory rooms in at least two fatal cases: lineman Milton Stewart, amid his offseason training at Arkansas Baptist University, with his medical history of seizures possibly involved; and Sherrell Smith, 18, a receiver just arrived at Missouri Valley College, for preseason practice, whom a coroner determined died of diabetic ketoacidosis.
None of these deaths involved football as contributing factor, according to Mueller and Colgate.
Their 2012 report, however, does count a pair of highly similar cases as game-related: Tyrone Duplessis, 21, and Gary Tinsley, 22, both at large universities.
A heart attack killed Duplessis, a 5-8, 200-pound running back at Louisiana Tech, according to information from family members. Duplessis was training in the football offseason when he awoke from sleep and suffered the fatal event.
Tinsley was an NFL hopeful training in springtime on campus, graduating from the University of Minnesota, where he had starred at linebacker four years for the Golden Gophers. But Tinsley, 6-1, 231 pounds, died in his dormitory room because of enlarged heart, cardiomegaly, according to a medical examiner’s ruling.
Football Escapes Blame for Pulmonary Embolism in Players
Football-funded researchers are hard-pressed to associate the game with some types of blood clots that threaten or kill players, particularly involving the lungs and extremities.
A pair of tragic cases occurred in 2011, of Marcellis Williamson, 23, and Alec Mounkes, 13, with both player deaths disqualified as game-related by Mueller and Colgate for their year’s UNC report.
Williamson was an NFL hopeful in training that spring, a recent graduate of Ohio University, where he excelled in football as a noseguard at 6-1, 327 pounds. He died before the NFL draft of pulmonary thrombosis, a mobile blood clot that lodged in lung artery, according to autopsy results released by his father, Brian Perkins.
The coroner’s office found the blood clot but not its origin, which could have helped answer questions regarding a possible football link to Williamson’s death. “They took a sample to see if they could figure out where (the blood clot) came from,” Perkins told The Ohio University Post. “Without any trauma in other areas, it was hard to determine where it came from.”
Mounkes, of Kansas, was a seventh grader who sustained an ankle injury during a football game for Lyndon Middle School in October 2011. Blood clots developed and the boy was hospitalized for weeks, undergoing amputation of both legs and suffering cardiac arrest before he died of surgery complications, according to information released by the school.
Blood-clot deaths of three players in 2012 were also passed over by Mueller and Colgate, excluded from statistics for football fatalities: Rico Webb, 17, of Maryland; Ben Jordan, 16, South Carolina; and Jacob Siebert, 14, in Missouri.
Webb, a 6-7, 365-pound senior at Dematha High School in February 2012, as a line recruit for Alabama State University, was training regularly for college football when he was hospitalized for chest pains and died within hours. The cause was a pulmonary embolism, according to a medical examiner’s office.
Jordan, a 6-1, 250-pound offensive lineman for Belton-Honea Path High School, died amid a second bout with an undisclosed blood disorder that hospitalized him in successive football seasons, as a sophomore and a junior. A coroner found cause of death was a “massive” blood clot that reached the lungs.
Siebert, who played for Seckman High School near St. Louis, died during football season of a pulmonary embolism that originated in his legs. Local rumor held that Siebert was hurt at football practice the week before, but school officials said he did not report an injury to coaches. Autopsy revealed no trauma: “I don’t see a connection to any football injury,” said Dr. Mary Case, St. Louis County medical examiner.
Flag Football, '7-On-7' Drills Were Deadly in 2012
Some medical experts consulted by this reporter believe new definitions and classifications are overdue in the study of risk and casualty for American football.
The NCCSIR method at UNC restricts gathering of player deaths and non-fatal catastrophic casualties, with the latter focus confined to survivor cases of the brain, skull and spinal column. The UNC data also do not include grave football casualties among coaches, referees, and bystanders along sidelines, such as a schoolteacher and a TV reporter injured severely by impacts from helmeted football players in 2011.
In addition, UNC researchers rather arbitrarily divide the football realm to pursue cases from select activities within the tackle format only.
Questions surrounding the shaky NCCSIR methodology include:
Should deaths and critical survivor casualties of “7-on-7” drills and flag football be added to annual statistics, for the goal of constructing valid, reliable epidemiology on the American sport?
Is flag football a safe alternative for kids, instead of tackle versions?
Both 7-on-7 and flag football proved certifiably deadly in 2012, producing at least four fatalities among reports online. Two were deaths of impacts, by hits to brain and neck.
In Texas, 15-year-old Jacob Gatlin collided heads with another boy during an “athletics program” session without helmets, at Hawkins ISD High School. Gatlin, apparently an aspiring football player, later fell ill and was air-lifted to a hospital, where he died of a skull fracture and subdural hematoma. According to Hawkins ISD superintendent Dan Rose, “everyone involved with the athletic program knows the steps to follow and the protocol for (head) injuries,” reported The Big Sandy & Hawkins Journal. “The athletics class was mainly a (football) passing drill, also called 7-on-7.” In a prepared statement, Rose attributed Gatlin’s fatal injuries to “flag football.”
Flag football and “touch” football are games generally perceived as benign, practically harmless, but the action is typically fast and physical. American football without helmets and pads nevertheless inspires speed collisions that are hazardous, ranging from blocking among players without armor to passes that draw flying bodies to intersect, smash together, like in the fatal case of Jacob Gatlin.
A baseball player died of violent injuries from touch football at Richton High School in Mississippi, 2012. Alex Lott, 17, and baseball teammates were playing the game as offseason conditioning when he launched headfirst into ground and fractured his neck at the C5 vertebra, damaging the spinal cord. Emergency surgery stabilized the break but Lott’s condition deteriorated; he was placed on life support and passed away of strokes.
At least two sudden-death cases were reported in flag football last year. A 22-year-old man, publicly unidentified, collapsed during a game in Virginia and later died at a hospital. In Texas, Jason Mouton, 18, died after collapsing during intramural practice at Blinn College in Brenham. No autopsy results were posted online.
None of these fatalities qualifies as football-related for 2012, according to Mueller and Colgate at the NCCSIR.
100 Football Deaths Likely Wouldn't Sway Public, Says Yesalis
Advocates of American football recite a popular legend these days, declaring that game brutality began subsiding a century ago, after President Teddy Roosevelt “saved” the sport by making it “safer.” And advocates offer a fatality number as benchmark for football savagery, 18 collisions deaths in 1905, the likes of which are long gone, they say.
Rule changes and “proper technique” for contact, supposedly to reduce head-ramming, are saving graces for football players now, advocates claim.
A few factors render the argument faulty, however, for proclaiming the 1905 gridiron exceeded the danger of modern football, with present-day players largely immune to mortal risk.
Foremost, modern trauma surgery, antibiotic drugs and skull-preserving helmets have dramatically reduced collision deaths in football, down to an average handful in recent years. Mueller and Colgate, in likely their most accurate statistic, find an average of three to four cases annually.
A parallel domain is the U.S. military, where deaths of wounds in Afghanistan, for example, occur at a third of the rate during World War II.
Even Mueller acknowledges modern medicine has lowered direct fatalities in football. “I think that’s related to kids getting better medical care on the field,” Mueller observed in prepared statement last summer. “They’re not dying, but they’re having permanent brain damage.”
In addition, head-bashing upright at full speed was not the prime threat a century ago, but instead the plodding mobs of run-oriented football by slower, smaller players in heads covered by leather.
The sport was just beginning to incorporate forward passing, and plays from scrimmage were like rugby scrums. Most direct casualties resulted from the crushing and ripping of bodies, not the helmet blasts of hard shells today, in open field.
In fact, internal injuries led causes of death in football a century ago, not brain bleeds, according to period news reports and books, along with a contemporary collection of 1905 fatalities by blogger Tom Benjey, a mathematics PhD.
Thus modern medicine is saving a horde of players today who would have died in 1905, hundreds perhaps, for severe internal injuries and conditions largely untreatable a century ago, including cases of heatstroke, cardiac arrest, organ rupture, infection, and blood clots resulting of fractures and sprains.
An Indiana teenager is one of those contemporary survivor cases of internal injuries inflicted during football. Last week Steven Bailey, 15, was catastrophically injured in a game while running the football for Edinburgh High School.
A photo shows multiple tacklers leading with helmets and shoulders hitting Bailey, a collision that ruptured his spleen, lacerated a kidney, and punctured a lung. The life-threatening wounds were first misdiagnosed on the sideline as injured ribs, and the teen began collapsing, unable to sit or walk on crutches.
Bailey’s parents helped load him into a family vehicle and they planned to drive him to a hospital close to their home. Then Steven started screaming in pain and they took him to the nearest emergency room.
“He was pale white when we got there so doctors must have been able to tell it was internal bleeding,” said Harvey Bailey, the father. “As they were pushing the blood into his body, you could see the color coming back into his face. They said it was a good thing we got him there when we did. The decision to take him further down the road would have cost him his life.”
Harvey Bailey describes the lethal impacts on his son as “clean” and says Steven “should be able to play football next season,” reports The Indianapolis Star.
The family hopes Steven is released from the hospital this weekend.
So trauma surgery and power antibiotics save another modern football player, although he now faces long-term health consequences, prescription drug use, and medical bills.
And football advocates carry on, proclaiming mortality rate is practically negligible in a new age of safer play, from youth leagues to the NFL.
Charles Yesalis, the epidemiologist, wonders whether football fatality numbers short of a multitude mean much to the American public, anyway, and he worries for the fact untold survivor cases like Steven Bailey pass unreported, unrecorded in official game statistics.
“When you focus on those 15 deaths (in the 2012 UNC report), or 35, or 50, even a hundred in football, there’s a natural public inclination that ‘Okay, it’s only those 15 or 50 or whatever, and everybody else is fine,’ ” Yesalis says.
“No, everybody else is not fine.”
Coming this fall at ChaneysBlog: Survivors of critical injuries in American football 2012
Matt Chaney is a writer, editor, teacher and restaurant worker living in Missouri, USA. He played and coached football while completing his journalism degree at Southeast Missouri State University in 1985. As a college football player, Chaney used anabolic drugs for performance and suffered a paralyzing knee injury. Later, his thesis study for an MA degree at the University of Central Missouri was qualitative media analysis of historical print coverage of anabolic steroids and HGH in American football, based largely on electronic search among thousands of news texts from the 1970s through 1999. For more information, including about Chaney’s 2009 book, Spiral of Denial: Muscle Doping in American Football, visit the homepage at www.fourwallspublishing.com. Email him at mattchaney@fourwallspublishing.com.
Deaths of American Football Players in Google Reports, 2012
By Matt Chaney, mattchaney@fourwallspublishing.com.
Jan. 10: Matt Tautolo, 20, California, an aspiring player for Cerritos College, died after collapsing on an athletic field during his first day of football orientation, said head coach Frank Mazzotta. The school announced Tautolo was stricken during “physical education activity class on a campus field,” a report states. Among files in Google at time of this posting, none discussed autopsy findings by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s Office, which received the case. Tautolo reportedly had open-heart surgery in 2008. Sources: Cerritos.Patch.com, Cerritos College and Randy Economy.
Feb. 2: Tyrone Duplessis, 21, Louisiana, a 5-8, 200-pound running back for Louisiana Tech University, died of a heart attack after waking from sleep. The day before, Duplessis attended an offseason workout for the football program. The Lincoln Parish Coroner’s Office received the case and autopsy reportedly found heart attack as cause of death. Sources: New Orleans Times-Picayune and CBSSports.com. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Feb. 26: Rico Webb, 17, Maryland, a 6-7, 365-pound lineman recruit for Alabama State University, senior at Dematha High School, died of a pulmonary thromboembolism, a blood clot in lungs, according to the Office of The Chief Medical Examiner. Webb had been hospitalized hours before his death, complaining of chest pains. The teen was training regularly for college football, a friend said. Sources: Washington Post, NBCWashington.com and WUSA-TV.
March 17: A 22-year-old male, Virginia, collapsed while playing adult flag football in Arlington. He arose, spoke briefly, and collapsed again. The man, whose name was not publicized, was pronounced dead at a local hospital. A police spokesman suggested a pre-existing medical condition contributed, reports WashingtonExaminer.com.
April 6: Gary Tinsley, 22, Minnesota, a 6-1, 231-pound linebacker at the University of Minnesota, an aspiring pro player, died in his apartment. Cause of death was cardiomegaly, or enlarged heart, according to the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office. Family and friends said Tinsley had been asymptomatic except for a mention to his mother a few months previous, when he noted experiencing headaches and chest pain during weightlifting and running. Tinsley had played four years of NCAA football for the university and was training for an opportunity with the NFL. Sources: Florida Times-Union and Minnesota Daily. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
April 22: Tanner Barton, 19, Indiana, a 6-3, 290-pound lineman for Marian University, died in sleep at a friend’s house. Police said the teen consumed alcohol the night before but family members rejected alcohol as cause of death, saying they believed an undiagnosed medical condition likely contributed. At time of this posting, no report in Google discussed autopsy or toxicology results from the Howard County Coroner’s Office. Sources: Kokomo Tribune, WCPO-TV, WTHR-TV, WBIW-TV and Facebook.com.
May 6: Cody Stephens, 18, Texas, a 6-9, 305-pound lineman recruit for Tarleton State University, a senior at Crosby High School, died in sleep. Cause of death was sudden cardiac arrest spurred by “hypercardiomyopathy,” malfunctioning internal fibers of the heart, which was “slightly enlarged,” according to the Harris County Medical Examiner’s Office. The deceased player’s father, Scott Stevens, said a $25 electrocardiogram could have detected his son’s condition as part of a football physical. Sources: Lake Houston Observer, Highlands Star-Crosby Courier and KTRK-TV.
May 6: Milton Stewart, 19, Arkansas, a football player for Arkansas Baptist University, was found dead in his dormitory room around noon. Police did not suspect foul play, and Stewart’s roommate said the player took medication for a “lifelong seizure ailment.” School officials said that known medical problems of Stewart, like “history of seizures,” may have contributed to the death. At time of this posting, Google search produced no report of autopsy results by the Pulaski County Coroner’s Office. Sources: KLRT-TV, KARK-TV and KTHV-TV.
May 12: David Coleman II, 32, Ohio, a 6-1, 235-pound offensive and defensive lineman for the semipro team Jay County Panthers of Indiana, died during a game of colliding with an opponent, being struck in his chest. The Lucas County Coroner’s Office received the case and reportedly determined a burst aorta as cause of death. Fundraising helped defray expenses for the family of Coleman, who was unemployed and uninsured. Sources: Toledo Blade, WANE-TV and ESPN.Go.com. *This case qualifies as direct result of American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
May 17: Jacob Gatlin, 15, Texas, a student at Hawkins ISD High School, died two days after a football-related brain injury at the school. Gatlin apparently collided heads with another boy in flag football during a reported “athletics class… mainly a passing drill, also called 7-on-7.” Gatlin was removed from play then sent home when he reported a severe headache. His condition worsened, leading to ICU hospitalization, and death was of a subdural hematoma caused by a fractured skull and ruptured artery, according to the Dallas County Medical Examiner’s Office. Fundraising helped offset expenses. Sources: Big Sandy & Hawkins Journal, KETK-TV, KYTX-TV and KLTV-TV.
May 17: Anthony Vaeao, 18, California, a 6-3, 325-pound lineman recruit for Arizona Western College, died after collapsing while playing basketball in physical education class at Mission Hills High School, where he was a senior. Cause of death was cardiac hypertrophy, abnormal enlargement of the heart, with obesity as a contributing factor, according to the San Diego County Medical Examiner’s Office. Fundraising helped defray expenses. Sources: UTSanDiego.com and XETV-TV.
June 12: Jalen Davis, teenager, Tennessee, a receiver and cornerback for Lebanon High School, died during sleep at his home. Davis, a sophomore to-be, had been participating in summer workouts at the school for both the football and basketball programs. The Wilson County Coroner’s Office received the case, but no autopsy results were available in Google reports at time of this posting. Sources: Lebanon Democrat and WZTV-TV.
July 6: Willie Mims, 43, Pennsylvania, a semipro defensive back and receiver, collapsed and died at an evening practice session for the Electric City Chargers in Wilkes-Barre. Mims’ teammates wondered whether heat factored into his death, according to Donnie Jackson-Bey, a teammate who said Mims was stricken while performing foot drills. Family members said doctors believed a pre-existing heart condition likely contributed to the death. No autopsy was mentioned in Google reports.
July 19: Burke Cobb, 14, Louisiana, a 6-4, 215-pound offensive lineman for Dutchtown High School, collapsed and died after participating in a football workout and pickup basketball game at the school. The Ascension Parish Coroner’s Office received the case, and cause of death reportedly was hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Fundraising helped defray expenses. Sources: Baton Rouge Advocate, WBRZ-TV and HealthFair.com. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
July 23: Nicholas Dellaventura, 15, New York, a 5-8, 210-pound offensive lineman for St. Joseph by-the-Sea High School, died after collapsing during a football conditioning session at the school. Coaches supervised the voluntary workout and players did not wear pads or helmets. Doctors believed a sudden cardiac event likely caused the death, but initial autopsy results were inconclusive, according to the Office of The Chief Medical Examiner on Staten Island. The Dellaventura family has filed a lawsuit alleging heatstroke negligence against football coaches, the school, the athletic director, and the Archdiocese of New York. Sources: Staten Island Advance, New York Post, New York Daily News, New York Times, CBSNews.com, MyFoxNY.com and SILive.com. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Aug. 8: Daniel Lule, 17, Illinois, a 5-9, 235-pound defensive lineman for Hall High School, died after collapsing during football practice at the school. Lule was stricken during a non-contact agility drill, and cause of death was an enlarged heart, according to the Bureau County Coroner’s Office. Sources: LaSalle News Tribune, Peoria Journal Star and Bureau County Republican. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Aug. 10: Sherrell Smith, 18, Missouri, a receiver for Missouri Valley College, was pronounced dead after being found unresponsive in his dormitory room. August football practices had just begun on campus. Cause of death was diabetic ketoacidosis, according to the Saline County Coroner’s Office. Sources: Marshall Democrat, St. Louis Post-Dispatch and KSDK-TV.
Aug. 17: Jason Holland, 15, Georgia, an offensive lineman for Ola High School, was stricken by a medical condition at his home, following an afternoon football practice, and died two days later. The Henry County Coroner’s Office received the case, and cause of death was reportedly of a heart attack caused by narrowing of arteries. Sources: WSB-TV, Henry Daily Herald and Atlanta Journal-Constitution. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Aug. 21: Dana Payne, 15, Tennessee, a 5-11, 143-pound receiver and defensive back for Millington High School, died following a tackle by another player in football practice at the school. Payne caught a pass and was struck in his torso, rendering him unable to stand again. Payne experienced breathing difficulties then lost consciousness. Cause of death was an attack of bronchial asthma with torso impact a likely contributor, according to the Shelby County Medical Examiner’s Office. Source: Memphis Commercial Appeal. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Aug. 28: Jonathan Vasiliou, 16, New York, a lineman for Queensbury High School, became ill, exhibiting symptoms of severe infection, about 36 hours following a football scrimmage. He died the next day in a hospital. Doctors ruled out many types of contagious infections as a possible cause, and no autopsy was performed. Sources: Albany Times Union, Glen Falls Post Star and Saratoga Saratogian. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Sept. 6: Ben Jordan, 16, South Carolina, a 6-1, 260-pound offensive guard for Belton-Honea Path High School, died of a blood clot that reached lungs, according to the Greenville County Coroner’s Office. Jordan was initially stricken by blood clots during football practice in summer 2011, sidelining him for that game season. He was cleared to return to football for spring drills in 2012 but suffered more dangerous clotting during August football camp, hospitalizing him prior to his team’s opening game. Sources: Anderson Independent Mail, FoxCarolina.com and WGOG-Radio.
Sept. 29: Tyler Miller, 14, New York, a football player for Barker/Royalton-Hartland High School, died during sleep at his home. Miller also coached youth football. Initial autopsy results were inconclusive, and further analysis examined possibility of an undetected heart defect or other illness. Sources: Lockport Union-Sun & Journal, WGRZ-TV and WIVB-TV.
Oct. 5: Ronald Rouse, 18, South Carolina, a 6-4, 320-pound lineman for Hartsville High School, died after collapsing during a game. Cause of death was sudden cardiac arrhythmia spurred by a congenitally enlarged heart, according to the Darlington County Coroner’s Office. Fundraising helped defray expenses. Sources: Florence Morning News, The Sporting News, WCSC-TV and The Associated Press. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Oct. 7: Jesse Watlington, 11, Florida, a middle-school football player for Southwest Florida Christian Academy, died four days after being struck by lightning during football practice at the school. Watlington was comatose in an ICU before being removed from life support. Fundraising helped defray expenses. The Watlington family has filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against McGregor Baptist Church, which hosts the school. Sources: Tampa Bay Times, WFTX-TV, WINK-TV and WZVN-TV. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Oct. 9: Jason Mouton, 18, Texas, a student at Blinn Junior College, died after collapsing during flag-football practice for his intramural team on campus. No autopsy results were available at time of this posting, but a previously undiagnosed heart condition may have contributed to the death. Fundraising helped defray expenses. Sources: Kingwood Observer, Houston Chronicle, KBTX-TV and Summer Creek High School.
Oct. 17: JheVontae Davis, 14, Virginia, a fullback and defensive tackle for Oscar Smith High School, died after collapsing during a practice session. The state Office of Chief Medical Examiner received the case, but no autopsy results were available at time of this posting. Family members of Davis said he complained of chest pain before collapsing on the football field and that an asthma attack likely contributed to the death. Fundraising helped defray expenses. Sources: Virginian-Pilot and WAVY-TV. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Oct. 21: John Bloomfield, 22, California, a 6-1, 245-pound defensive end for Sacramento State University, died of complications that began with a lung injury sustained during a game on Aug. 30. After an initial hospitalization, Bloomfield’s condition deteriorated and he was readmitted on Sept. 19 for a collapsed lung, undergoing multiple surgeries. Problems developed, such as internal bleeding, and Bloomfield lapsed into a coma. He eventually was removed from life support. No autopsy was mentioned in available reports. Fundraising helped defray expenses. Sources: Sacramento Bee, Sacramento State Hornet and AnyGivenSaturday.com. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Oct. 21: Charles, Melillo, 27, New York, a semipro football player for the Westchester Vengeance, died at home while awaiting scheduled surgery for neck fractures sustained during a game on Sept. 22. Melillo also suffered a severe concussion in that football collision. No autopsy was mentioned in reports available online. Fundraising help defray expenses. Sources: Harrison.Patch.com, lohud.com, 10-13.org and Port Chester Daily Voice. *This case qualifies as direct result of American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Oct. 24: Jacob Siebert, 14, Missouri, a running back for Seckman High School, died in hospital of a blood clot that moved from his legs to the lungs, according to the St. Louis County Medical Examiner’s Office. Siebert had participated in football activity four or five days prior to death, apparently, and reports of his sustaining an injury circulated locally. Autopsy, meanwhile, found no link to a football injury. Sources: St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Arnold.Patch.com, KTVI-TV and KSDK-TV.
Nov. 4: Alex Lott, 17, Mississippi, a baseball player for Richton High School, died two days after suffering a broken neck in a pickup game of football at the school. Lott and his baseball teammates were playing touch football for offseason conditioning when he fell headfirst and fractured the C5 vertebra. Lott immediately underwent surgery then, the next day, he suffered cerebral strokes. Sources: WDAM-TV, Hattiesburg American and Jackson Clarion-Ledger.
Nov. 7: William Wayne Jones III, 19, Tennessee, a 5-11, 175-pound defensive back for Tennessee State University, died after collapsing during a practice session on campus without pads and helmets. The Davidson County Medical Examiner’s Office received the case but no autopsy results appeared in Google reports at time of this posting. Jones’ parents are suing the university, alleging coaches did not diligently tend to Jones after his collapse, which occurred a few minutes past 4 p.m., witnesses say. The first 911 call for Jones was logged about 4:35 p.m. and he arrived at hospital by ambulance about 5 p.m., according to a timeline of events. Sources: WSMV-TV, WKRN-TV and Nashville City Paper. *This case qualifies as indirectly related to American football in 2012, according to the Mueller-Colgate report at UNC.
Nov. 19: Austin Lempera, 16, Illinois, an offensive lineman for Lincoln-Way Central High School, collapsed and died while exercising at home. An attending physician said cardiac arrhythmia possibly contributed in the death. The Will County Coroner’s Office received the case, but no autopsy details were available in Google reports at time of this posting. Sources: Joliet Herald-News, NewLenox.Patch.com, Mokena.Patch.com and KTBC-TV.
Dec. 3: David Widzinski, 16, Michigan, a 6-3, 210-pound linebacker and running back for Detroit Catholic Central High School, died during sleep at his home. Heart malfunction triggered the death, an arrhythmia of unknown origin, according to the Wayne County Medical Examiner’s Office. Sources: Detroit.CBSLocal.com, Oakland Press and MLive.com.
Dec. 14: Temoc Castellanos, 15, California, a lineman for Jordan High School, died three days after collapsing on the school running track during offseason football training. No autopsy is mentioned in online reports, but a previously undiagnosed heart defect might have contributed. Sources: GazettesSports.com and BelmontShore.Patch.com.
Dec. 18: Thomas Allen, 17, Alabama, a football player for Lawrence County High School, died after collapsing while throwing and catching a football at the school. Cause of death was a heart attack, according to preliminary exam by the Lawrence County Coroner’s Office, with autopsy pending at a state forensics lab. No further information was available in online reports at time of this posting. Fundraising helped defray expenses. Sources: Decatur Daily, WAAY-TV and WAFF-TV.
Matt Chaney is a writer, editor, teacher and restaurant
worker living in Missouri, USA.
He earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism at Southeast Missouri
State University
in 1985, where he played football and coached as a student assistant. His 2001
graduate thesis study for an MA degree at the University of Central Missouri
was qualitative media analysis of 466 football reports, historical print
coverage of anabolic steroids and HGH in American football, based on electronic
search among thousands of news texts from the 1970s through 1999. For more
information, including contact numbers and Chaney’s 2009 book, Spiral of
Denial: Muscle Doping in American Football, visit his homepage at www.fourwallspublishing.com.
Showing posts with label chaney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chaney. Show all posts
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Wednesday, November 02, 2011
Chaney talks NFL HGH testing
PED expert Matt Chaney recently engaged in an email Q&A with journalist and author Stefan Fatsis, of Slate, answering his questions regarding the current NFL debate over HGH testing. The text of our prepared discourse follows here. Meanwhile, follow Stefan on his football-season co-op with Deadspin writers, as they debate the issues in NFL roundtable; listen for him on NPR, for sports comments and reports; and check out Stefan’s acclaimed book A Few Seconds of Panic: A Sportswriter Plays in the NFL, recounting his Plimptonian quest as kicker for the Denver Broncos. Matt Chaney
Fatsis: Q. In layman's terms, why do you believe the WADA HGH test that the NFL is pushing is “suspect”?
Well, suspicion begins on the real problem for HGH blood testing as it stands today: The fact that American medicine and credible medical bodies abroad have yet to see a democratic, scientific, straight-up independent peer review of this purported breakthrough in doping detection—a WADA scientist’s patented immunoassay for GH-isoform ratios in human blood—or this potential goldmine “test” that generates from closed European research and secretive WADA engineers who remain virtually inaccessible.
Even WADA associates like HGH-testing pioneer Dr. Peter Sonksen, London, hardly know what’s up. Sonksen, creator of the GH-biomarker test that is open to independent review but WADA yet avoids, told me he hasn’t associated with former colleague Dr. Christian Strasburger since about 1999. Sometime around the Sydney Olympics, Strasburger, having become a full-time scientist of WADA, patented the assay for GH isomers. From the start, Sonksen says, Strasburger’s insurmountable problem has been a detection window of only hours, requiring drug informants and Draconian “whereabouts” tracking of athletes to typically log a positive result for use of bio-cloned or recombinant human growth hormone. “You have to take a blood sample within 24 hours of their injecting it,” Sonksen told me.
Dr. Don Catlin, endocrinologist and our foremost American expert on anti-doping methodology and tools, can’t get access to Strasburger and the in-house WADA studies allegedly establishing validity and reliability of the GH-isoform test. WADA officials in Canada say to just trust them, but Catlin doesn’t yet in America. “You’ve got to have hard-core evidence…,” Catlin told me. “ ‘Here’s the study. Here’s what we did. Here’s what we found. Here’s the [data on] false-positive [results]. Here’s the false-negative.’ ”
Catlin and Sonksen say WADA would likely be challenged to prove validity and reliability of Strasburger’s test in American trial court—and the anti-doping agencies know it. Sonksen is a longtime associate of WADA and the IOC, a charter member of the anti-doping establishment worldwide, yet he hammers anti-doping officials and their disregard for transparent scientific protocol: “I think there’s a certain fear among the, ah, [WADA] politicians that if it comes to a case in court [against the GH-isoform], they won’t win it,” Sonksen told me.
Q. Can every scientist drafted to work for WADA (or USADA) be in the bag somehow, or simply be willing to compromise scientific standards? Why, given the legitimate public concern and outcry over doping in sports, would they move forward with an unreliable test or tests?
You kiddin’ me? These are sports medicine people—or else they’re “independent scientists” directly hired, paid, funded, whatever, by the anti-doping agencies and sports organizations. Do you think they have a contract or association with powerful sport and anti-doping if they speak sensibly, telling us anti-doping will never turn back rampant drug use among athletes? These are the same type of people who tell us we can properly detect and manage football’s inherent brain injuries through “concussion testing.”
So-called scientists and doctors have pandered to politics of anti-doping and sport since the 1980s at least in America. The NFL’s hireling or associate “experts” have become dime a dozen, selling us their false hopes for preventing systemic drug use and brutality. These people come from everywhere anymore, and shamelessly. And if you don’t play ball, like Catlin won’t, then you scrounge for funding in your research, like he does now. Or you’re just a sports idiot with a doctorate who wants to believe the complex, irreversible problems of athletics can be fixed. And dumb media parrot the mere talk. It’s all become a pathetic joke, an American travesty of truth and public perception.
And the public does not care about doping in sport, especially American football, the sport perhaps most conducive to drug use on earth, from steroids and Growth to speed and painkillers.
The moral bleating of grandstanding politicians and ill-informed media does not qualify as public outcry. We bitch as a public about gas prices, not drugs in our football.
Q. If you were the NFL and the players union, what would you do on this matter? Wait for a test? Or is testing, for HGH anyway, futile and beside the point?
All of the silliness can end immediately if WADA and the NFL will do what the players and union demand: Practice simple American scientific transparency so Dr. Stasburger’s HGH test for WADA can be independently vetted for validity and reliability—or not.
Catlin and Sonksen, for example, both make their validating research available for peer review, including to scientists of player unions. The documents of Sonksen’s GH-biomarker and Catlin’s carbon-isotope ratio scan for synthetic testosterone are available for peer analysis and replication. Any American worker would demand as much for undergoing a blood test, especially if a positive result meant loss of work and pay.
All that said, yes and repeating, I think anti-doping as it stands for now and in the foreseeable future is hopeless for turning back muscle doping in American football. The historical and contemporary evidence is clearly laid out in my 2009 book, Spiral of Denial. If I were a football player today, for example, especially of the NFL, I would be utterly confident in beating Catlin’s CIR and I would find the ways to beat Sonksen’s biomarker, were it deployed by WADA and the league. Strasburger’s isoform would be of non-consequence for stopping my HGH use, and if chopsticks ever caught a fly in me, so to speak, I would crush that test in trial court.
Q. Where do you stand on the efficacy of HGH? The reliability of existing tests aside, should sports organizations even bother testing for it?
Clinical studies have found rHGH injections can change fat to muscle, among some measurable effects, but my belief of the drug’s performance-enhancing nature is based on anecdotal evidence offered by users I’ve known and in published accounts. College and pro athletes testify of recuperative effects for injecting bio-tech growth hormone while weightlifters and football players say the substance builds mass when used in complement with androgenic chemicals, synthetic testosterone and/or anabolic steroids. Also note the bio-tech GH analogues available today, such as IGF-1 and growth-hormone-releasing peptides, which athletes and bodybuilders readily use and the anti-doping agencies are hopeless to fight.
Q. Given your anecdotal conclusions that HGH has some effects, do you believe it would be good to remove the drug from football were it possible?
Absolutely, prevention of synthetic performance-enhancing substances is my foremost goal, which is often lost, about me, in my points on lousy testing to-date and in the foreseeable future.
Listen, I’ve waited for effective anti-doping in football since about 1980, when I seriously wanted to try college football and was seriously afraid of all the drug-using players in the game by then, covering the big-school rosters in particular.
The problem, testing of blood or urine isn’t working, isn’t close to working, and will surely never work, and the people selling this crap know that! But you think some yak from WADA or USADA will admit as much, still intending to hold his or her job?
Now, to credit of such people, they’re told to stop a Death Star and given a pop gun. The anti-doping efforts, from teen studies to testing, have never had a chance for pitiful funding to start, as Dr. Catlin can attest, as Penn State epidemiologist Charles Yesalis can attest, along with so many other researchers and officials. We haven’t seen the billions of dollars needed in mere startup for anti-doping, just to plausibly develop and deploy some of these ideas for success or failure. As we stand, anti-doping operates on about $300 to $400 annually, U.S. dollars, covering research and development to detection applications, worldwide.
Q. And one non-HGH question: Briefly tell me your backstory again. How'd you get so involved in the issue? And why does it matter so much to you?
I don’t know why I’m still around the football issues of doping and injuries, to be frank, and I likely won’t be much longer. I’m 51 with a family and don’t get paid or funded by anyone, and my former vocation of sportswriting is no help; American football’s partner media want little to do with my work, from TV networks down to the smallest newspapers. Sales of my book are horrendous. I drive old cars, wear old clothes and clip coupons. My only source of income presently is kitchen jobs.
What sort of thrust me here today is my background as an athlete and coach. I injected synthetic testosterone to gain size and power as a college football player, at Southeast Missouri State in 1982, and later as a student coach I helped a player obtain testosterone—and really didn’t want to commit any of the acts. I felt I had to for remaining in football.
Within a few years, as a sportswriter, I decided that any real reform must begin with open discussion, among all parties and without punishing anyone. I'm still waiting for that moment. And my prime concern is athletes, especially kids; I want the truth declared for them, about football's terrible dangers, if not their parents. Lousy, hopeless testing, for our discussion here, only serves to cover football's 50-year-old doping problem, and only players suffer the consequences.
Q. And, here's a left-field question: How do you feel about NFL football as a sport—not as a business run by Goodell, not vis a vis HGH or brain injury—but as a sport, as an entertainment?
I think the NFL and big-time NCAA football together constitute the single-most valuable entertainment vehicle in America. And the essential reason is sport violence. Football is “contact ballet” set amid a social spectacle, says Michael Oriard, former NFL lineman and renowned cultural analyst. Football is athleticism in the face of annihilation. That’s why we play and why we watch, damn the casualties, largely kids. My advice, if anybody really wants to “save kids” from drugs in football, or head injuries, don’t let them play this crazy game. Forget the football mythology, especially quick fixes.
Fatsis: Q. In layman's terms, why do you believe the WADA HGH test that the NFL is pushing is “suspect”?
Well, suspicion begins on the real problem for HGH blood testing as it stands today: The fact that American medicine and credible medical bodies abroad have yet to see a democratic, scientific, straight-up independent peer review of this purported breakthrough in doping detection—a WADA scientist’s patented immunoassay for GH-isoform ratios in human blood—or this potential goldmine “test” that generates from closed European research and secretive WADA engineers who remain virtually inaccessible.
Even WADA associates like HGH-testing pioneer Dr. Peter Sonksen, London, hardly know what’s up. Sonksen, creator of the GH-biomarker test that is open to independent review but WADA yet avoids, told me he hasn’t associated with former colleague Dr. Christian Strasburger since about 1999. Sometime around the Sydney Olympics, Strasburger, having become a full-time scientist of WADA, patented the assay for GH isomers. From the start, Sonksen says, Strasburger’s insurmountable problem has been a detection window of only hours, requiring drug informants and Draconian “whereabouts” tracking of athletes to typically log a positive result for use of bio-cloned or recombinant human growth hormone. “You have to take a blood sample within 24 hours of their injecting it,” Sonksen told me.
Dr. Don Catlin, endocrinologist and our foremost American expert on anti-doping methodology and tools, can’t get access to Strasburger and the in-house WADA studies allegedly establishing validity and reliability of the GH-isoform test. WADA officials in Canada say to just trust them, but Catlin doesn’t yet in America. “You’ve got to have hard-core evidence…,” Catlin told me. “ ‘Here’s the study. Here’s what we did. Here’s what we found. Here’s the [data on] false-positive [results]. Here’s the false-negative.’ ”
Catlin and Sonksen say WADA would likely be challenged to prove validity and reliability of Strasburger’s test in American trial court—and the anti-doping agencies know it. Sonksen is a longtime associate of WADA and the IOC, a charter member of the anti-doping establishment worldwide, yet he hammers anti-doping officials and their disregard for transparent scientific protocol: “I think there’s a certain fear among the, ah, [WADA] politicians that if it comes to a case in court [against the GH-isoform], they won’t win it,” Sonksen told me.
Q. Can every scientist drafted to work for WADA (or USADA) be in the bag somehow, or simply be willing to compromise scientific standards? Why, given the legitimate public concern and outcry over doping in sports, would they move forward with an unreliable test or tests?
You kiddin’ me? These are sports medicine people—or else they’re “independent scientists” directly hired, paid, funded, whatever, by the anti-doping agencies and sports organizations. Do you think they have a contract or association with powerful sport and anti-doping if they speak sensibly, telling us anti-doping will never turn back rampant drug use among athletes? These are the same type of people who tell us we can properly detect and manage football’s inherent brain injuries through “concussion testing.”
So-called scientists and doctors have pandered to politics of anti-doping and sport since the 1980s at least in America. The NFL’s hireling or associate “experts” have become dime a dozen, selling us their false hopes for preventing systemic drug use and brutality. These people come from everywhere anymore, and shamelessly. And if you don’t play ball, like Catlin won’t, then you scrounge for funding in your research, like he does now. Or you’re just a sports idiot with a doctorate who wants to believe the complex, irreversible problems of athletics can be fixed. And dumb media parrot the mere talk. It’s all become a pathetic joke, an American travesty of truth and public perception.
And the public does not care about doping in sport, especially American football, the sport perhaps most conducive to drug use on earth, from steroids and Growth to speed and painkillers.
The moral bleating of grandstanding politicians and ill-informed media does not qualify as public outcry. We bitch as a public about gas prices, not drugs in our football.
Q. If you were the NFL and the players union, what would you do on this matter? Wait for a test? Or is testing, for HGH anyway, futile and beside the point?
All of the silliness can end immediately if WADA and the NFL will do what the players and union demand: Practice simple American scientific transparency so Dr. Stasburger’s HGH test for WADA can be independently vetted for validity and reliability—or not.
Catlin and Sonksen, for example, both make their validating research available for peer review, including to scientists of player unions. The documents of Sonksen’s GH-biomarker and Catlin’s carbon-isotope ratio scan for synthetic testosterone are available for peer analysis and replication. Any American worker would demand as much for undergoing a blood test, especially if a positive result meant loss of work and pay.
All that said, yes and repeating, I think anti-doping as it stands for now and in the foreseeable future is hopeless for turning back muscle doping in American football. The historical and contemporary evidence is clearly laid out in my 2009 book, Spiral of Denial. If I were a football player today, for example, especially of the NFL, I would be utterly confident in beating Catlin’s CIR and I would find the ways to beat Sonksen’s biomarker, were it deployed by WADA and the league. Strasburger’s isoform would be of non-consequence for stopping my HGH use, and if chopsticks ever caught a fly in me, so to speak, I would crush that test in trial court.
Q. Where do you stand on the efficacy of HGH? The reliability of existing tests aside, should sports organizations even bother testing for it?
Clinical studies have found rHGH injections can change fat to muscle, among some measurable effects, but my belief of the drug’s performance-enhancing nature is based on anecdotal evidence offered by users I’ve known and in published accounts. College and pro athletes testify of recuperative effects for injecting bio-tech growth hormone while weightlifters and football players say the substance builds mass when used in complement with androgenic chemicals, synthetic testosterone and/or anabolic steroids. Also note the bio-tech GH analogues available today, such as IGF-1 and growth-hormone-releasing peptides, which athletes and bodybuilders readily use and the anti-doping agencies are hopeless to fight.
Q. Given your anecdotal conclusions that HGH has some effects, do you believe it would be good to remove the drug from football were it possible?
Absolutely, prevention of synthetic performance-enhancing substances is my foremost goal, which is often lost, about me, in my points on lousy testing to-date and in the foreseeable future.
Listen, I’ve waited for effective anti-doping in football since about 1980, when I seriously wanted to try college football and was seriously afraid of all the drug-using players in the game by then, covering the big-school rosters in particular.
The problem, testing of blood or urine isn’t working, isn’t close to working, and will surely never work, and the people selling this crap know that! But you think some yak from WADA or USADA will admit as much, still intending to hold his or her job?
Now, to credit of such people, they’re told to stop a Death Star and given a pop gun. The anti-doping efforts, from teen studies to testing, have never had a chance for pitiful funding to start, as Dr. Catlin can attest, as Penn State epidemiologist Charles Yesalis can attest, along with so many other researchers and officials. We haven’t seen the billions of dollars needed in mere startup for anti-doping, just to plausibly develop and deploy some of these ideas for success or failure. As we stand, anti-doping operates on about $300 to $400 annually, U.S. dollars, covering research and development to detection applications, worldwide.
Q. And one non-HGH question: Briefly tell me your backstory again. How'd you get so involved in the issue? And why does it matter so much to you?
I don’t know why I’m still around the football issues of doping and injuries, to be frank, and I likely won’t be much longer. I’m 51 with a family and don’t get paid or funded by anyone, and my former vocation of sportswriting is no help; American football’s partner media want little to do with my work, from TV networks down to the smallest newspapers. Sales of my book are horrendous. I drive old cars, wear old clothes and clip coupons. My only source of income presently is kitchen jobs.
What sort of thrust me here today is my background as an athlete and coach. I injected synthetic testosterone to gain size and power as a college football player, at Southeast Missouri State in 1982, and later as a student coach I helped a player obtain testosterone—and really didn’t want to commit any of the acts. I felt I had to for remaining in football.
Within a few years, as a sportswriter, I decided that any real reform must begin with open discussion, among all parties and without punishing anyone. I'm still waiting for that moment. And my prime concern is athletes, especially kids; I want the truth declared for them, about football's terrible dangers, if not their parents. Lousy, hopeless testing, for our discussion here, only serves to cover football's 50-year-old doping problem, and only players suffer the consequences.
Q. And, here's a left-field question: How do you feel about NFL football as a sport—not as a business run by Goodell, not vis a vis HGH or brain injury—but as a sport, as an entertainment?
I think the NFL and big-time NCAA football together constitute the single-most valuable entertainment vehicle in America. And the essential reason is sport violence. Football is “contact ballet” set amid a social spectacle, says Michael Oriard, former NFL lineman and renowned cultural analyst. Football is athleticism in the face of annihilation. That’s why we play and why we watch, damn the casualties, largely kids. My advice, if anybody really wants to “save kids” from drugs in football, or head injuries, don’t let them play this crazy game. Forget the football mythology, especially quick fixes.
Friday, August 26, 2011
WADA Stonewalls NFL Players on Suspect HGH Test
By Matt Chaney
for The Phanatic Magazine
This story of skullduggery follows the classic theme of what looks like, walks like, talks like, often isn’t.
It features contemporary names and concepts in NFL news, of purported wisdom, science and integrity, and illusion, smoke and mirrors, when black is actually white, or the seeming good guys bad, and so forth.
This is about NFL management and players, which party is really to blame for the serious dispute over beleaguered, so-called Olympic testing for recombinant human growth hormone—a growing fight preventing full ratification of the new collective bargaining agreement celebrated as ending the lockout and restoring America’s beloved football season.
Long-short, the problem party of HGH testing is not the players and union, per the imagination of dumb sportswriters and politicians.
In reality the players are getting railroaded over HGH blood testing, or were, and they refuse to play along, as PA officials have clarified for months in private communication with the league, according to current union memos obtained by Chaney’s Blog.
Shady dealing begins with the quasi-governmental entities World Anti-Doping Agency and American arm USADA, which are funded by government and sport organs. WADA-USADA bureaucrats incessantly promote their closed “science” for dubious synthetic GH detection that’s ripped mercilessly by independent experts worldwide.
“WADA refused to provide scientific information justifying the reliability of their HGH test (validation studies, population studies, performance testing between labs, etc.),” states an union email circulated among members Wednesday afternoon, following a meeting of NFLPA representatives with anti-doping and league officials at WADA headquarters in Montreal.
“We leave here with more questions than answers,” the union memo continues. “The quality of player care is non-negotiable and we will continue to press for all the relevant data. We want to ensure that any testing meets the highest standards and has scientific consensus.”
Obfuscation is also game plan for NFL management, especially commissioner Roger Goodell and his frontman on the issue, attorney Adolpho Birch, senior vice president of law and labor policy. Goodell and Birch utter nonsense on HGH testing, for more than a year running, only to go unchallenged by sport reporters who parrot the misinformation.
League officials blatantly misled the union before Wednesday’s confab in Canada, promising to finally produce documentation on the controversial GH “isoform” test, validation studies withheld by WADA at least seven years, including from NFLPA experts who’ve filed specific requests since April.
Obviously the league promise proved phony in Montreal, where no missing data were forthcoming Wednesday, and longtime observers of WADA and its in-house isoform immunoassay would only expect as much.
Critics like preeminent testing engineer Dr. Don Catlin in Los Angeles, a former tester for Olympic and pro sports who operates the non-profit Anti-Doping Research laboratory.
Catlin has waited for scientific information on the GH-isoform test since before WADA deployment at the Athens Olympic Games in 2004. “You want to see the data,” Catlin told me in 2007. “A scientist says, ‘Fine, show me the data, show me the paper that’s been [peer] reviewed and published.’ ”
“You’ve got to have hard-core evidence…,” Catlin continued: “ ‘Here’s the study. Here’s what we did. Here’s what we found. Here’s the [rate of] false-positive. Here’s the false-negative.’ ”
“I never pay any attention to what they say [WADA officials],” Catlin dismissed. “I only pay attention to what’s published. And if there’s something published in peer-review literature on the [HGH] test, I’ll know all about it.”
What of the mysterious WADA studies, I wondered then, that supposedly establish test validity and reliability?
“Well, they’re always being conducted,” Catlin said. “I hear of them. But with so much I’ve heard over the years, I just go way back and believe only what I can touch and feel myself.”
“It’s in the interest of a sport organization to say they have a test, because they don’t look very good when they don’t have a test. I have a letter from WADA, two years old [circa 2004], saying a test for growth hormone will be released shortly,” Catlin noted. “You lose credibility when you speak before you’re sure.”
Epidemiologist Charles E. Yesalis of Penn State, an ScD and foremost expert on sport doping, discussed WADA defiance of scientific protocol for implementing faulty approaches in punitive anti-doping, with only athletes punished for the scattered positive results, among countless false-negatives.
“I’m just astounded,” Yesalis, avowedly conservative, told me in February 2010 as NFL and MLB officials started chirping favorably about WADA blood testing for growth hormone.
“I mean, if you’re going to ruin somebody’s life, and if you don’t have [vetted methodology] totally locked up, to me that is immoral and unethical,” Yesalis said. “I’d rather see five million cheaters compete than see scientists bastardizing themselves.”
I interviewed Catlin again about the isoform, with no essential change in play since we spoke three years previous—nothing substantially improved about testing method and instrument since their patenting by WADA prior to Athens.
And despite the first reported positive result on Feb. 22, 2010, for British rugby player Terry Newton, 31, who admitted HGH use uncontested and accepted a two-year suspension under WADA guidelines.
An informant had fingered Newton for no-notice testing, the typical way for detection through the isoform’s laughable window of but a few hours to perhaps a day.
“Well, if you know the guy’s going to shoot up this morning, and you arrive at noon, OK,” Catlin remarked, caustically. “Glad it works that way.”
“They can’t do much about the detection window,” Catlin said of the isoform’s great insurmountable limitation, if not debunking factor. “That’s the nature of the test.”
Scientific literature still lacked credible review on the WADA isoform, then six years in use with some 1,500 negative results until Newton, and Catlin wasn’t surprised.
Who would want to vouch for this lousy, unvalidated application? No credible scientist or other authority, anywhere on the planet.
“It is simply not a useful test, no matter how you cut it or spin it,” Catlin said.
* * * * * *
For almost five months, the NFL Players Association has asked WADA and the league to provide simple validating information for the GH-isoform assay, a blood test used on athletes for punitive anti-doping since 2004, according to recent union documents obtained by this blog and an Aug. 9 letter to WADA quoted by Juliet Macur of The New York Times..
Union officials, in the final week leading to Wednesday’s face-to-face with WADA and the NFL, beseeched anti-dopers and league brass to come clean, produce any substantial research data on the isoform.
Apparently, the question arises whether WADA even has a formal article on its closet research. An Aug. 19 union letter to Birch at the NFL states: “we understand… that no technical document exists on the isoform test. If our understanding is incorrect, and a technical document exists either in final or draft form, we renew our request for those documents.”
That letter to Birch last Friday, written by NFLPA associate general counsel Heather M. McPhee, channels mounting union frustration with WADA and NFL management—and players’ skepticism and mistrust for alleged HGH testing.
McPhee informed Birch the union had “concerns” about management conduct and WADA cooperation. Birch’s agenda for the Montreal meeting did not provide for ample discussion of the scientific controversy, McPhee emphasized, particularly since union experts supposedly were to receive and review critical documents on spot.
McPhee noted recent materials the PA received from both the NFL and WADA were essentially useless, largely irrelevant to questions at hand, perhaps even “mistakenly included.”
“We emphasize that the vast majority of these items consist of papers or abstracts that involve a different [rHGH] test—the marker test—and not the isoform test the NFL is currently proposing.”
McPhee noted the August materials received “again [do not] include the [agency] validation studies, reference and population studies, and validation studies conducted by each WADA [accredited] laboratory that uses the isoform test.”
In closing, McPhee reiterated dire need for union experts to review literature prior to the discussion time Birch scheduled for the impending meeting, an hour in Montreal, absurdly short. “For this reason, again, we continue to strongly encourage you to provide the information,” McPhee implored of Birch in New York.
Birch apparently didn’t reply to McPhee in Washington for four days, until Tuesday, on eve of everyone’s gathering in Montreal—and of course without the necessary documents on WADA testing..
McPhee fired right back to Birch by email Tuesday, tactfully scolding on several points, including the reality that issue discussions would only have to continue.
“It is apparent that we will not receive the information that we requested from both WADA and the NFL prior to the meeting tomorrow,” McPhee wrote. “In light of that circumstance, it is impossible for the substantive issues regarding this matter to be resolved tomorrow, and we need to plan for additional meetings in the near future.”
In addition, McPhee corrected Birch for his public misstatements regarding what the union and players have agreed upon thus far: “your statement that the NFLPA made two testing proposals, most recently three weeks ago, is not accurate.”
“In early August, [the] NFLPA engaged in negotiations in response to the League’s proposal,” McPhee wrote, “but as you know, the NFLPA clearly stated that any agreement regarding HGH testing is contingent on the NFLPA’s satisfaction with rigorous independent analysis and assessment of the test that the NFL has proposed for use on players.”
By Wednesday north of the border, NFLPA representatives had literally chased WADA yaks and NFL sidekicks to Montreal, but for no avail. Once again, an earnest party hit wall in quest for WADA disclosure on its notorious HGH testing.
“WADA won’t show the numbers,” Catlin had already surmised, a year ago. “They recognize, rightfully, that as soon as they do show the numbers, there could be difficulty.”
* * * * * * *
The epitome of fluffy NFL rhetoric on blood testing, mostly inaccurate, has been statements by Adolpho Birch, league attorney assigned to the issue.
In dialogues with reporters, Birch portrays suspect HGH detection as “solution” for protecting NFL players and even impressionable youths, ensuring “clean competition and a level playing field.” He claims the league welcomes input from “all expertise,” but, he adds “the program we have designed will be effective and will meet any sort of scrutiny that will be put on it.”
Birch claims HGH testing “has been used by the top labs for years now and has withstood legal challenge upon appeal.”
Regarding ever-present expert rebuke and adverse evidence of GH-isoform test efficacy, Birch says: “From our perspective, there are no significant detractions to its effectiveness or reliability.”
“We believe, like every other test we have ever used, we will be able to improve that [detection] time. All tests evolve as the science and the technology evolves. We expect [the isoform] to be the same way. It is a far different thing than unreliability, which would be something that would promote a false-positive [result], something you absolutely cannot have in the context of drug testing.”
“There has been zero indication from anyone since sort of the dawn of this test that false-positives are an issue,” Birch says, wholly false.
In fact, many indie experts—including Catlin, Yesalis, University of Texas biostatistician Donald A. Berry, and former BALCO doping guru Victor Conte—argue that false-positives have yet to be ruled out, given insufficient information made public to date.
Anti-doping agencies even acknowledge the fact, with an NFLPA letter, quoted by The Times, inquiring about “WADA’s acceptance of a 1 in 10,000 false-positive rate” for the GH-isoform.
Meanwhile, contrary to Birch’s version, the WADA test has not faced challenge in a courtroom of law, democratic or otherwise, nowhere yet.
The appeal process that Estonia skier Andrus Veerpalu presently follows, as one of 5 known positive-result cases among some 4,000 HGH assays since the Athens Games, is confined to the kangaroo arbitration cells of elite amateur sport. Veerpalu, age 40, is the only athlete reported to formally contest the WADA test so far.
Newton, the unfortunate first known to test positive, committed suicide last year within months of the announced result, and Berry took exception from afar, hearing the news in America.
In 2008, Berry, the data expert, shredded anti-doping as generally bad science in a widely read review he authored for Nature journal. “If conventional doping testing were to be submitted to a regulatory agency such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to qualify as a diagnostic for a disease, it would be rejected,” Berry told science writer Brian Alexander, reporting for MSNBC.com.
Last year I notified Berry of Newton’s death, and the normally reserved scientist blasted circumstances of modern athletes, those clean or “cheating,” for entrapment perpetuated and driven by questionable or invalid anti-doping that somehow skirts law, ethics, fairness—wherever, whenever deemed necessary by an official few so powerful, of sport, media and government.
“Terry Newton’s plight should be a wake-up call to all,” Berry wrote to me and others, by email. “As a society we cannot take this issue lightly. What many regard to be a small penalty can be a death sentence.”
“Are we trying to save sport? High-level sport? At what cost? Is it worth it? Quite obviously we’re ruining people’s lives. Perhaps we should be exacting such extreme penalties to save sport so we can be entertained by athletes on what we like to think is a level playing field. But a few people should not be making this decision for the rest of us. And the entire process of labeling people with the stain of cheater should be defensible and not cloistered.”
“Are we trying to save the bodies of young people?” Berry continued. “If so, is the tack we’ve taken even remotely reasonable? And is the trade-off of bodies saved and lives ruined appropriate, even if our tack is eventually successful?”
“I don’t pretend to have the answers to these questions, but they must be debated much more broadly than presently, with the pros and cons of the various approaches clearly delineated and widely publicized.”
“And, oh yes, we must get the science right,” Berry affirmed in conclusion, “and we must appropriately and adequately fund research in this area so we have a chance of getting it right.”
Matt Chaney is a writer, editor, teacher and restaurant worker living in Missouri, USA. Email him at mattchaney@fourwallspublishing.com . For more information, including about his 2009 book, Spiral of Denial: Muscle Doping in American Football, visit the homepage at www.fourwallspublishing.com .
for The Phanatic Magazine
This story of skullduggery follows the classic theme of what looks like, walks like, talks like, often isn’t.
It features contemporary names and concepts in NFL news, of purported wisdom, science and integrity, and illusion, smoke and mirrors, when black is actually white, or the seeming good guys bad, and so forth.
This is about NFL management and players, which party is really to blame for the serious dispute over beleaguered, so-called Olympic testing for recombinant human growth hormone—a growing fight preventing full ratification of the new collective bargaining agreement celebrated as ending the lockout and restoring America’s beloved football season.
Long-short, the problem party of HGH testing is not the players and union, per the imagination of dumb sportswriters and politicians.
In reality the players are getting railroaded over HGH blood testing, or were, and they refuse to play along, as PA officials have clarified for months in private communication with the league, according to current union memos obtained by Chaney’s Blog.
Shady dealing begins with the quasi-governmental entities World Anti-Doping Agency and American arm USADA, which are funded by government and sport organs. WADA-USADA bureaucrats incessantly promote their closed “science” for dubious synthetic GH detection that’s ripped mercilessly by independent experts worldwide.
“WADA refused to provide scientific information justifying the reliability of their HGH test (validation studies, population studies, performance testing between labs, etc.),” states an union email circulated among members Wednesday afternoon, following a meeting of NFLPA representatives with anti-doping and league officials at WADA headquarters in Montreal.
“We leave here with more questions than answers,” the union memo continues. “The quality of player care is non-negotiable and we will continue to press for all the relevant data. We want to ensure that any testing meets the highest standards and has scientific consensus.”
Obfuscation is also game plan for NFL management, especially commissioner Roger Goodell and his frontman on the issue, attorney Adolpho Birch, senior vice president of law and labor policy. Goodell and Birch utter nonsense on HGH testing, for more than a year running, only to go unchallenged by sport reporters who parrot the misinformation.
League officials blatantly misled the union before Wednesday’s confab in Canada, promising to finally produce documentation on the controversial GH “isoform” test, validation studies withheld by WADA at least seven years, including from NFLPA experts who’ve filed specific requests since April.
Obviously the league promise proved phony in Montreal, where no missing data were forthcoming Wednesday, and longtime observers of WADA and its in-house isoform immunoassay would only expect as much.
Critics like preeminent testing engineer Dr. Don Catlin in Los Angeles, a former tester for Olympic and pro sports who operates the non-profit Anti-Doping Research laboratory.
Catlin has waited for scientific information on the GH-isoform test since before WADA deployment at the Athens Olympic Games in 2004. “You want to see the data,” Catlin told me in 2007. “A scientist says, ‘Fine, show me the data, show me the paper that’s been [peer] reviewed and published.’ ”
“You’ve got to have hard-core evidence…,” Catlin continued: “ ‘Here’s the study. Here’s what we did. Here’s what we found. Here’s the [rate of] false-positive. Here’s the false-negative.’ ”
“I never pay any attention to what they say [WADA officials],” Catlin dismissed. “I only pay attention to what’s published. And if there’s something published in peer-review literature on the [HGH] test, I’ll know all about it.”
What of the mysterious WADA studies, I wondered then, that supposedly establish test validity and reliability?
“Well, they’re always being conducted,” Catlin said. “I hear of them. But with so much I’ve heard over the years, I just go way back and believe only what I can touch and feel myself.”
“It’s in the interest of a sport organization to say they have a test, because they don’t look very good when they don’t have a test. I have a letter from WADA, two years old [circa 2004], saying a test for growth hormone will be released shortly,” Catlin noted. “You lose credibility when you speak before you’re sure.”
Epidemiologist Charles E. Yesalis of Penn State, an ScD and foremost expert on sport doping, discussed WADA defiance of scientific protocol for implementing faulty approaches in punitive anti-doping, with only athletes punished for the scattered positive results, among countless false-negatives.
“I’m just astounded,” Yesalis, avowedly conservative, told me in February 2010 as NFL and MLB officials started chirping favorably about WADA blood testing for growth hormone.
“I mean, if you’re going to ruin somebody’s life, and if you don’t have [vetted methodology] totally locked up, to me that is immoral and unethical,” Yesalis said. “I’d rather see five million cheaters compete than see scientists bastardizing themselves.”
I interviewed Catlin again about the isoform, with no essential change in play since we spoke three years previous—nothing substantially improved about testing method and instrument since their patenting by WADA prior to Athens.
And despite the first reported positive result on Feb. 22, 2010, for British rugby player Terry Newton, 31, who admitted HGH use uncontested and accepted a two-year suspension under WADA guidelines.
An informant had fingered Newton for no-notice testing, the typical way for detection through the isoform’s laughable window of but a few hours to perhaps a day.
“Well, if you know the guy’s going to shoot up this morning, and you arrive at noon, OK,” Catlin remarked, caustically. “Glad it works that way.”
“They can’t do much about the detection window,” Catlin said of the isoform’s great insurmountable limitation, if not debunking factor. “That’s the nature of the test.”
Scientific literature still lacked credible review on the WADA isoform, then six years in use with some 1,500 negative results until Newton, and Catlin wasn’t surprised.
Who would want to vouch for this lousy, unvalidated application? No credible scientist or other authority, anywhere on the planet.
“It is simply not a useful test, no matter how you cut it or spin it,” Catlin said.
* * * * * *
For almost five months, the NFL Players Association has asked WADA and the league to provide simple validating information for the GH-isoform assay, a blood test used on athletes for punitive anti-doping since 2004, according to recent union documents obtained by this blog and an Aug. 9 letter to WADA quoted by Juliet Macur of The New York Times..
Union officials, in the final week leading to Wednesday’s face-to-face with WADA and the NFL, beseeched anti-dopers and league brass to come clean, produce any substantial research data on the isoform.
Apparently, the question arises whether WADA even has a formal article on its closet research. An Aug. 19 union letter to Birch at the NFL states: “we understand… that no technical document exists on the isoform test. If our understanding is incorrect, and a technical document exists either in final or draft form, we renew our request for those documents.”
That letter to Birch last Friday, written by NFLPA associate general counsel Heather M. McPhee, channels mounting union frustration with WADA and NFL management—and players’ skepticism and mistrust for alleged HGH testing.
McPhee informed Birch the union had “concerns” about management conduct and WADA cooperation. Birch’s agenda for the Montreal meeting did not provide for ample discussion of the scientific controversy, McPhee emphasized, particularly since union experts supposedly were to receive and review critical documents on spot.
McPhee noted recent materials the PA received from both the NFL and WADA were essentially useless, largely irrelevant to questions at hand, perhaps even “mistakenly included.”
“We emphasize that the vast majority of these items consist of papers or abstracts that involve a different [rHGH] test—the marker test—and not the isoform test the NFL is currently proposing.”
McPhee noted the August materials received “again [do not] include the [agency] validation studies, reference and population studies, and validation studies conducted by each WADA [accredited] laboratory that uses the isoform test.”
In closing, McPhee reiterated dire need for union experts to review literature prior to the discussion time Birch scheduled for the impending meeting, an hour in Montreal, absurdly short. “For this reason, again, we continue to strongly encourage you to provide the information,” McPhee implored of Birch in New York.
Birch apparently didn’t reply to McPhee in Washington for four days, until Tuesday, on eve of everyone’s gathering in Montreal—and of course without the necessary documents on WADA testing..
McPhee fired right back to Birch by email Tuesday, tactfully scolding on several points, including the reality that issue discussions would only have to continue.
“It is apparent that we will not receive the information that we requested from both WADA and the NFL prior to the meeting tomorrow,” McPhee wrote. “In light of that circumstance, it is impossible for the substantive issues regarding this matter to be resolved tomorrow, and we need to plan for additional meetings in the near future.”
In addition, McPhee corrected Birch for his public misstatements regarding what the union and players have agreed upon thus far: “your statement that the NFLPA made two testing proposals, most recently three weeks ago, is not accurate.”
“In early August, [the] NFLPA engaged in negotiations in response to the League’s proposal,” McPhee wrote, “but as you know, the NFLPA clearly stated that any agreement regarding HGH testing is contingent on the NFLPA’s satisfaction with rigorous independent analysis and assessment of the test that the NFL has proposed for use on players.”
By Wednesday north of the border, NFLPA representatives had literally chased WADA yaks and NFL sidekicks to Montreal, but for no avail. Once again, an earnest party hit wall in quest for WADA disclosure on its notorious HGH testing.
“WADA won’t show the numbers,” Catlin had already surmised, a year ago. “They recognize, rightfully, that as soon as they do show the numbers, there could be difficulty.”
* * * * * * *
The epitome of fluffy NFL rhetoric on blood testing, mostly inaccurate, has been statements by Adolpho Birch, league attorney assigned to the issue.
In dialogues with reporters, Birch portrays suspect HGH detection as “solution” for protecting NFL players and even impressionable youths, ensuring “clean competition and a level playing field.” He claims the league welcomes input from “all expertise,” but, he adds “the program we have designed will be effective and will meet any sort of scrutiny that will be put on it.”
Birch claims HGH testing “has been used by the top labs for years now and has withstood legal challenge upon appeal.”
Regarding ever-present expert rebuke and adverse evidence of GH-isoform test efficacy, Birch says: “From our perspective, there are no significant detractions to its effectiveness or reliability.”
“We believe, like every other test we have ever used, we will be able to improve that [detection] time. All tests evolve as the science and the technology evolves. We expect [the isoform] to be the same way. It is a far different thing than unreliability, which would be something that would promote a false-positive [result], something you absolutely cannot have in the context of drug testing.”
“There has been zero indication from anyone since sort of the dawn of this test that false-positives are an issue,” Birch says, wholly false.
In fact, many indie experts—including Catlin, Yesalis, University of Texas biostatistician Donald A. Berry, and former BALCO doping guru Victor Conte—argue that false-positives have yet to be ruled out, given insufficient information made public to date.
Anti-doping agencies even acknowledge the fact, with an NFLPA letter, quoted by The Times, inquiring about “WADA’s acceptance of a 1 in 10,000 false-positive rate” for the GH-isoform.
Meanwhile, contrary to Birch’s version, the WADA test has not faced challenge in a courtroom of law, democratic or otherwise, nowhere yet.
The appeal process that Estonia skier Andrus Veerpalu presently follows, as one of 5 known positive-result cases among some 4,000 HGH assays since the Athens Games, is confined to the kangaroo arbitration cells of elite amateur sport. Veerpalu, age 40, is the only athlete reported to formally contest the WADA test so far.
Newton, the unfortunate first known to test positive, committed suicide last year within months of the announced result, and Berry took exception from afar, hearing the news in America.
In 2008, Berry, the data expert, shredded anti-doping as generally bad science in a widely read review he authored for Nature journal. “If conventional doping testing were to be submitted to a regulatory agency such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to qualify as a diagnostic for a disease, it would be rejected,” Berry told science writer Brian Alexander, reporting for MSNBC.com.
Last year I notified Berry of Newton’s death, and the normally reserved scientist blasted circumstances of modern athletes, those clean or “cheating,” for entrapment perpetuated and driven by questionable or invalid anti-doping that somehow skirts law, ethics, fairness—wherever, whenever deemed necessary by an official few so powerful, of sport, media and government.
“Terry Newton’s plight should be a wake-up call to all,” Berry wrote to me and others, by email. “As a society we cannot take this issue lightly. What many regard to be a small penalty can be a death sentence.”
“Are we trying to save sport? High-level sport? At what cost? Is it worth it? Quite obviously we’re ruining people’s lives. Perhaps we should be exacting such extreme penalties to save sport so we can be entertained by athletes on what we like to think is a level playing field. But a few people should not be making this decision for the rest of us. And the entire process of labeling people with the stain of cheater should be defensible and not cloistered.”
“Are we trying to save the bodies of young people?” Berry continued. “If so, is the tack we’ve taken even remotely reasonable? And is the trade-off of bodies saved and lives ruined appropriate, even if our tack is eventually successful?”
“I don’t pretend to have the answers to these questions, but they must be debated much more broadly than presently, with the pros and cons of the various approaches clearly delineated and widely publicized.”
“And, oh yes, we must get the science right,” Berry affirmed in conclusion, “and we must appropriately and adequately fund research in this area so we have a chance of getting it right.”
Matt Chaney is a writer, editor, teacher and restaurant worker living in Missouri, USA. Email him at mattchaney@fourwallspublishing.com . For more information, including about his 2009 book, Spiral of Denial: Muscle Doping in American Football, visit the homepage at www.fourwallspublishing.com .
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Critics, Evidence Debunk 'Concussion Testing' in Football
By Matt Chaney
for The Phanatic Magazine
This post is an excerpt preview for a pending analysis on Chaney’s Blog, ‘Brain Trauma Stalks Football Players, Dictates Impact Game Reform,’ which will include independent experts’ recommendations for constructive steps imperative to the sport’s survival at public schools and colleges.
Today’s official effort against gridiron brain trauma recycles the old “safer football” concept.
In the NFL and trickling down to colleges, schools and youth leagues, “behavior modification” of players involves teaching “proper contact,” or “form tackling” as known in 1976. Coaches tell football players to hit without using heads, as if hogs might be taught to fly.
Current purveyors of the theory, led by Chris Nowinski and Dr. Robert Cantu of the Sports Legacy Institute, and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell—who funds the Nowinski nonprofit with $1 million—propose action reminiscent of the plug-in electric football game, with plastic players bumping across the vibrating surface, hooking at shoulders in ring dances.
And that’s only the beginning of hocus-pocus remedy for rampant head injury in American football.
While mysteries are daunting for the problem, like positive diagnosis of concussion, mere clinical intuition guides the varied protocols of diagnosis and judgment for when players are fit to compete again. No random clinical trial of legitimacy has been attempted.
“It is scary,” said Dr. Lester Mayers, concussion researcher of Pace University athletics, who joins experts like Dr. Bennet Omalu in sounding alarm over football’s touting concussion testing, which is parroted by media.
These critics warn football conducts dangerous “concussion management” based on incomplete research for assessing symptoms, and many brain-injured players are prematurely returning to contact, all ages, typically within days.
Indeed, radiology techniques are demonstrating holes in concussion testing, notably of studies at Purdue University, where functional MRI reveals that sub-concussive brain injury in prep players is completely missed by external assessments through computer.
At Purdue, teen football athletes displaying brain injury through diffusion tensor imaging, an fMRI technique, are otherwise registering normal state in the intuitive-grounded baseline tests and monitoring systems of neuropsychology.
Meanwhile, concussion testing takes a thrashing in independent peer review.
Current Sports Medicine Reports recently published another scathing analysis by Christopher Randolph in Chicago, professor of neurology at Loyola University, who details glaring faults in “baseline” testing of hot-selling ImPACT software employed by youth leagues, schools, colleges and pro sports. “The use of baseline neuropsychological testing in the management of sport-related concussion has gained widespread acceptance, largely in the absence of any evidence suggesting that it modifies risk for athletes,” Randolph observes.
Since 2005, Randolph is among reviewers for several journals who find unacceptable rates of false-positive and false-negative results for ImPACT, among popular brain assessments developed and marketed by academics and doctors associated with the NFL and benefiting from the league’s pervasive publicity machine.
“It is a major conflict of interest, scientifically irresponsible,” Randolph told ESPN The Magazine in 2007. “We are trying to get to what the real risks are of sports-related concussion, and you have to wonder why they (NFL experts) are promoting testing. Do they have an agenda to sell more ImPACTS?”
The marketing succeeds, with sales to a thousand schools and hundreds of colleges thus far, and media only increase exposure of ImPACT in the furor over concussions, especially in football.
An overwhelming majority of journalists, politicians, educators and football experts ignore the accumulating evidence rebuking concussion testing as invalid and unreliable, choosing instead to endorse the quick-fix notion and push it for mandate by law.
“With the tools to properly manage concussions and implement safety precautions, parents, coaches and students can change the culture of school sports for the better and keep our students safe on the field and thriving in the classroom,” declared U.S. Rep. George Miller, of California.
Such rhetoric confounds Mayers. “The response is infantile,” he said. “The ImPACT people have taken over the idea that somehow they can tell you when it’s OK that the athlete goes back.”
The engineers and marketers of ImPACT, neuropsychologists Mark R. Lovell and Michael W. Collins in Pittsburgh, did not respond to questions about their product recently forwarded them. Lovell is the former NFL director of NP testing, and his consulting for the Steelers franchise spurred development of ImPACT software. Collins is on the Steelers medical staff and consults for other teams. A third partner in the product is Dr. Joseph Maroon, Steelers neurosurgeon who serves on the NFL committee overseeing concussion management.
“The topic of sport-related concussion has been highly visible in the media over the last few years… and the issue of concussion management in the NFL even has reached the point of Congressional hearings,” Randolph wrote in the January-February edition of Reports. “What consistently is missing from these debates, however, is a rational, empirically-based discussion of the true risks associated with sport-related concussion, the potential for any given management strategy to modify these risks, and the actual evidence that such risk modification can be achieved. In addition, there has been little attention paid to the clinical validity or psychometric characteristics of (computer) baseline tests, despite widespread use of these measures.”
Randolph, characterizing utility of the tool as “clinical guesswork in most cases,” concluded: “It is clear that, to date, the baseline tests used in sport-related concussion management programs lack sufficient clinical validity and reliability for their intended purpose.”
Mayers cites lack of specificity and sensitivity for NP tests on the market. “Basically, they’re all unsuitable for clinical work with concussions,” said Mayers, director of sports medicine for Pace University in New York. “They don’t have the reliability, the accuracy or the validity, the three technical terms for the use of neuro-psych work. They’ll miss 20 to 25 percent of athletes who have concussions, and this has been used by the NFL and the National Hockey League, and the NCAA is considering mandating this.”
Word is that the NCAA will soon require concussion testing of all member schools, with NFL officials and experts behind the push, and Mayers says these factors helped his department adopt computer assessment, posing a dilemma for him.
Mayers authored a 2008 review published by Archives of Neurology, concluding a concussed athlete should be sidelined at least four to six weeks, but he notes football’s current “standard of practice” for brain trauma includes NP testing and fast return to play, so he conformed at Pace. “I really believe four to six weeks (recovery time) is appropriate, but it’s not the standard of community,” he said. “So I could be sued by an athlete I held out for four weeks, if he chose to do so.”
A neurology journal has approved publication of a new Mayers review, which denounces computerized concussion assessment, he said.
More medical voices doubt concussion testing. Dr. Randall Benson, imaging expert and neurologist at Wayne State University, warned Congress last year “that neuropsychology is not an exact science,” a fact echoed by Dr. Jeffrey Kutcher, of Michigan Neurosport, testifying for the same committee. “Relying on protocols is, in my opinion, potentially dangerous, clinical protocols, as they assume that concussions are similar enough to each other to fit a predetermined paradigm,” said Kutcher, who serves on committees for the NFL and American Academy of Neurology.
Last month, lawmakers heard a military concussion test fails miserably. The tool, Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics, “is insensitive and nonspecific,” said Lt. Gen. Eric Schoomaker, surgeon general of the U.S. Army. “It misses about a quarter to a third of (soldiers) who are concussed and includes about 50 percent of (those) not concussed.”
In addition, insurance companies inform the military and some schools that assessments lack scientific vetting and could raise liability stakes for personnel who administer the tests in error.
Dr. Omalu, practitioner of science and law, says concussion testing amounts to “fraud” in the context of accurate, reliable diagnosis, and it can be harmful during initial days following trauma—when most injured athletes, suffering chemical disruption of brain cells, are subjected to mental strain of the programs. The online ImPACT test lasts 20 to 30 minutes and presents memory challenges involving colors, texts and forms.
“ImPACT testing is not a diagnosis tool,” said Omalu, chief medical examiner for San Joaquin County, California, and director of autopsy for the independent Brain Injury Research Institute. “It is a forensic follow-up to monitoring a patient, to evaluate the amount of damage. Using (computerized) testing in the acute phase of injury can actually make the symptoms worse.”
Doctors outside sports medicine would agree, Omalu added, and apparently many who work in athletics, given media reports of concussed youths prescribed isolation with total layoffs ranging from a month to two years.
Dustin Fink, a certified athletic trainer in Illinois, seconds Omalu. Fink discourages computerized testing until a concussed athlete is free of symptoms such as headaches, memory loss and unsteadiness. “I use the NP tests as a baseline to educate the athlete about what some signs and symptoms could become present and as a true baseline when they think that are ready to return,” said Fink, an injury authority whose popular Website, theconcussionblog.com, serves as information clearinghouse.
Fink believes “money grab” drives overuse of concussion testing, and he generally supports Omalu’s publicized stance that longer rest is needed for concussed athletes. At Shelbyville High School, where Fink works, “we are seeing recovery times on the average of 24 days,” he said. “More and more evidence suggests that a 28 to 42-day (layoff) period may be necessary.”
In previous reports on Chaney’s Blog, Omalu has proposed concussed juvenile football players be sidelined at least three months. Omalu says NFL players should rest one to three months with diagnosed concussion, depending on severity and technology for treatment, which he advocates to be functional MRI that isn’t approved by the league.
Only sports in civilian life will quickly return the brain-injured to activity, and a practice of general medicine calls for strict isolation lasting days and longer, involving no stress mentally and physically.
In the military, researcher Craig Bryan, a psychologist and professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center, recently concluded that three days of isolation, removed from sunlight, was optimum for beginning treatment of concussed soldiers.
A neural consultant for the New York Jets once discouraged use of NP testing on a football player until symptoms abated, based on a large NCAA study he’d co-authored, and quickly found himself out of the league.
During a 2004 conference in New York, neuropsychologist Bill Barr remarked that “the research indicated that the best time to do neuropsychological tests on players with concussions was after their symptoms had completely cleared, usually five to 10 days after the trauma,” Peter Keating reported for ESPN in 2006.
Jets physician Dr. Elliot Pellman confronted Barr after the conference, and the neuropsychologist ended up losing both his job with the team and his place in league research. “NFL teams, Barr understood, preferred testing players just one to two days after a concussion, allowing for quicker diagnoses and returns to play,” Keating reported.
Barr, of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at NYU, did not respond to a recent interview request.
Matt Chaney is a journalist, editor, teacher and restaurant worker in Missouri, USA. For more information, including about his 2009 book, Spiral of Denial: Muscle Doping in American Football, visit the homepage at www.fourwallspublishing.com.
References
Alessi, A. (2010, December 17). Telephone interview with author.
Alessi, A. (2011, March 1). NFL labor talks focused on safety. Norwich Bulletin.
Anonymous. (2010, December 27). Player X: Compeition? Player safety? Yeah, right. It’s always about the money. ESPN The Magazine, p. 16.
Bachman, R. (2011, February 12). Concussions, an injury rising among teen athletes, more profound and enduring than previously known. Portland Oregonian.
Benson, R.R. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Randall R. Benson, M.D., assistant professor of neurology, Wayne State University. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Benson, R.R., Meda, S.A., Vasudevan, Z.K, Govindarajan, K.A., Hanks, R.A., Millis, S.R., Makki, M., Latif, Z., Copin, W., Meythaler, J., & Haacke, E.M. (2007, November 3). Global white matter analysis of diffusion tensor images is predictive of injury severity in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 24(3).
Benson, R.R., Gattu, R., Zhifeng, K., Haacke, E.M. (2010, May 1). The use of advanced MR Imaging methods in traumatic brain injury: Development of imaging biomarkers for improving diagnosis, outcome prediction and treatment. Integrated Neuroscience Session, American Academy of Neurology.
Benson, R.R. (2011, January 18). Email to author.
Blount, R. (2011, April 13). Concussion symptoms hard to recognize, treat. Minneapolis Star Tribune.
Brady, E., & Falgoust, J.M. (2011, April 14). Concussions now a hot issue as league toughens policies. USA Today.
Breer, J. (2011, March 25). Expert paints alarming picture of concussions. Southeast Missourian.
Brewin, B. (2011, March 16). Battlefield brain-injury assessment tool has high failure rate. www.nextgov.com.
Briggs, D. (2011, February 27). No messing with the head at MU. Columbia Tribune.
Brix, S. (2011, January 21). Local schools implement concussion testing programs to ensure safety of student athletes. North Shore Sun.
Broglio, S.P., Macciocchi, S.N., Ferrara, M.S. (2007, June). Sensitivity of the concussion assessment battery. Neurosurgery 60(6).
Broglio, S.P., Puetz, T.W. (2008, November 1). The effect of sport concussion on neurocognitive function, self-report symptoms and postural control: A meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 38(1).
Calvin, B.C. (2010, October 12). NFL educating kids about concussions. Sacremento Bee.
Cameron, A. (2011, January 2). Rampant concussions raising big questions on ice. Calgary Herald.
Cantu, R. (2010, December 21). Telephone interview with author.
Charkow, R. (2011, February 21). Battling sport’s concussion crisis: Ex-wrestler’s institute studies brains of deceased athletes to better understand brain trauma. www.cbc.ca.
Cleary, L. (2011, January 26). Concussions remain a gray area. www.nbcwashington.com.
Clover, J., & Wall, J. (2010, January). Return-to-play criteria following sports injury. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 29(1).
College Coaches. (2010, October 29). College coaches: Don’t blame us for helmet hits. Sports Illustrated.
Collins, M.W., Lovell, M.R., McKeag, D.B. (1999). Current issues in managing sports-related concussion. Journal of The American Medical Association, 282(24).
Comper, P., Hutchison, M., Magrys, S., Mainwaring, L., & Richards, D. (2010, October). Evaluating the methodological quality of sports neuropsychology concussion research: A systemic review. Brain Injury, 24(11).
Concussion Law. (2011, March 13). Rep. Gallison, Sen. Felag propose expansion of new student athlete concussion law. www.tiverton.patch.com.
Concussion Tests. (2011, March 6). Panel suggests concussion tests for Butte players. www.ktvq.com.
Conferences Criticized. (2010, February 2). Conferences criticized over concussion policies. The Associated Press.
Deitch, D. (2011, January 17). Poor tackling is the cause of concussions. Delaware County Daily Times.
Doherty, J. (2010, October 18). Concussion test tests patient’s patience. www.nwtimes.com.
Donaldson, A. (2011, January 10). Athletes face tough decision when hurt. Deseret News.
Duff, M. (2009, July 14). Management of sports-related concussion in children and adolescents. ASHA Leader.
Echemendia, R.J., Herring, S., & Bailes, J. (2009). British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43.
Eckner, J.T., Kutcher, J.S. (2010, Jan-Feb). Concussion symptom scales and sideline assessment tools: A critical literature update. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 9(1).
Electric Football. (1970 circa.) Old Coleco Electric Football commercial. www.youtube.com.
Engel, J.F. (2011, February 2). Steelers linebacker cuts through the hypocrisy. Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
Epstein, D. (2011, November 1). The damage done: While concussive hits dominate the debate, a groundbreaking new study suggests that minor blows—and there can be hundreds each game—are just as traumatic. Sports Illustrated.
Epstein, D. (2011, April 13). Unique study explores cumulative effect of hits in high school football. Sports Illustrated.
Evan, F. (2010, November 1). Early warning: Even at PeeWee level, coaches struggle to balance safety concerns with teaching toughness. Sports Illustrated.
Farrey, T. (2010, May 5). Questions vital to diagnosing concussion. ESPN.com.
Fernandes, D. (2010, January 1). Local teams tackling concussions with new technology. Virginian-Pilot.
Finley, D. (2011, April 7). Insomnia linked to post-injury headaches. San Antonio Express-News.
Fitz, G. (2011, April 3). ImPACT tests coming to a high school near you. Nashua Telegraph.
Flinchpaugh, B. (2011, January 24). Fort Zumwalt tackles concussion issue. St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
Football Injuries. (2011, April 13). Youth football injuries on the rise, study finds. Health Day News, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Fronick, A.M. (2010, December 28). ImPACT testing helps athletes safely return to play following concussion. The People’s Tribune.
Galvan, K. (2010, November 18). Mom says school handled son’s injury the wrong way. www.myfoxhouston.com.
Giger, C. (2010, October 28). A big ImPACT: Concussion test aids in precaution. Altoona Mirror.
Goodell Talks. (2010, October 23). Goodell talks about big hits. Scout.com.
Gregory, S. (2010, February 8). Problem with football: Our favorite sport is too dangerous: How to make it safer. Time.
Grindel, S.H., Lovell, M.R., & Collins, M.W. (2001, July). The assessment of sport-related concussion: The evidence behind neuropsychological testing and management. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 11(3).
Guskiewicz, K. (2011, January 8). Telephone interview with author.
Guskiewicz, K.M., McCrea, M., Marshall, S.W., Cantu, R.C., Randolph, C., Barr, W., Onate, J.A., & Kelly, J.P. (2003). The NCAA concussion study: Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players. Journal of The American Medical Association, 290(19).
Hamilton, J. (2011, February 2). Doctors throw flags on high school concussions. www.npr.org.
Haywood, L. (2011, March 7). Diagnostic tests and treatment in traumatic brain injuries. www.access-legal.co.uk.
Head Games. (2010, Summer). Head games: Where sports injury and science connect to understand and prevent a neuro-degenerative disease. Campus & Alumni News, Boston University, p. 9.
Hibbard, M.R. (2011, April 15). Rehab for the brain after traumatic injuries. American Psychological Association.
Hobson, M. (2010, October 27). NFL looking to avoid possible lawsuits stemming from severe player concussions. Vancouver Sun.
Hopper, M. (2009, October 29). Is the NFL too dangerous? Birmingham Weekly.
Hruby, P. (2010, October 22). Future shock: The death of football. ESPN.com.
Huff, D. (1987, January 5). High school deaths, injuries raise questions about safety: Athletes’ medical care may be inadequate. Washington Post, p. C3.
ImPACT Program. (Accessed 2011, January 25). ImPACT concussion evaluation and management program. www.medpsych.net.
ImPACT Reliability. (Accessed 2011, January 14). ImPACT reliability and validity. www.impacttest.com.
ImPACT Works. (2011, January 26). How ImPACT works and what it costs. Suburban Life Publications.
Jackson, N. (2011, January 7). A former player responds to Goodell’s open letter. Deadspin.com.
Jackson, N. (2011, January 24). Telephone interview with author.
Johnson, L.S.M. (2010, October 5). Kids, concussion and ConTACT: The shortcomings of return-to-play guidelines. Neuroethics & Law Blog.
Johnson, L.S.M. (2011, January 13). Email correspondence to author.
Jolly, T. (2010, February 8). Goodell stresses a culture of safety. www.nytimes.com.
Keating, P. (2006, October 24). Doctor yes. ESPN The Magazine.
Keating, P. (2007, August 9). NFL’s concussion expert also sells equipment to the league. ESPN The Magazine.
Keating, P. (2010, December 2). Is concussion testing good enough? ESPN.com.
King, P. (2010, October 17). Brandon Meriweather, James Harrison hits deserve hefty punishment. SportsIllustrated.CNN.com.
King, P. (2010, November 1). Concussions: The hits that are changing football. Sports Illustrated.
Kivela, P. (2010, November 1). Head injuries come to mind. Napa Valley Register.
Klaft, H. (2011, March 20). Effects of concussions go beyond playing field for Western High School student. Jackson Citizen Patriot.
Knight, D. (2010, December 21). Can’t rush recovery. WashingonPost.com.
Koeske, Z. (2010, November 8). Laws aim to protect student athletes with concussions, but money is lagging. PoliticsDaily.com.
Kutcher, J. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Jeffrey Kutcher, M.D., director, Michigan NeuroSport. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Levinthal, D. (2009, September 17). Politicians score significant cash from NFL owners, coaches and players. OpenSecrets.org.
Lovell, M.R. (2006, June). Letters to the editor. Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2).
Lowe, M. (2010, October 14). All-clear after concussion. Portland Press Herald.
Maerlender, A., Flashman, L., Kessler, A., Kumbhani, S., Greenwald, R., Tosteson, T., & McAllister, T. (2010, November-December). Examination the construct validity of ImPACT computerized test, traditional, and experimental neuropsychological measures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(8).
Magliocca, G. (2009, December). Assumption of risk and football. ConcurringOpinions.com.
Maroon, J. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Joseph Maroon, M.D., vice chair, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Martin, M. (2009, October 1). NFL players at risk for dementia. NPR.org.
Mayers, L. (2008, September). Return-to-play criteria after athletic concussion: A need for revision. Archives of Neurology, 65(9).
Mayers, L. (2011, January 31). Telephone interview with author.
McChesney, R. (1989). Media made sport. In Wenner, L.A. (Ed.). Media, sports & society. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
McCollum, D. (2011, April 14). Nac docs tell athletic directors to evaluate concussions. www.ktre.com. style="color:#666666">
McCory, P. (2007, December). Using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut: The modern management of concussions. Injury Prevention, 13(6).
McCrea, M., Guskiewicz, K., Randolph, C., Barr, W.B., Hammeke, T.A., Marshall, S.W., & Kelly, J.P. (2009, November). Effects of a symptom-free waiting period on clinical outcome and risk of reinjury after sport-related concussion. Neurosurgery, 65(5).
McDonald, J. (2010, September 23). Concussion cases hard to figure. ESPNBoston.com.
McKeag, D.B. (2003). Understanding sports-related concussion: Coming into focus but still fuzzy. Journal of The American Medical Association, 290(19).
McKeever, C.K., & Schatz, P. (2003). Current issues in the identification, assessment, and management of concussions in sport. Applied Neuropsychology.
McKenna, D. (2010, October 29). The NFL’s concussion politics. www.washingtoncitypaper.com.
Melchiome, C. (2010, October 30). Test helps schools play it safe with concussions. Philadelphia Inquirer.
Miller, G. (2011, January 31). Rep. George Miller: Lawmakers reintroduce legislation to protect student athletes from concussions. Columbia State.
Moore, A. (2011, March 5). From one hit in basketball practice, months of concussive injury. Lehigh Valley Express-Times.
Muchnick, I. (2011, January 11). Joseph Maroon, doctor for NFL and WWE, has it every which way on concussions. BeyondChron.
Muchnick, I. (2011, January 23). Sports concussion scandal ground zero: NFL and WWE Doc Joseph Maroon’s hype article in ‘Neurosurgery’ on Riddell Football Helmets. wrestlingbabylon.com.
Muchnick, I. (2011, April 18). Will Ritalin become the human growth hormone of sports concussion testing? www.beyondchron.org..
NFL’s Lead. (2010, November 5). Maine high schools follow NFL’s lead. Mobile Maine News.
Olson, E. (2011, January 16). NFL backs state regulations for youth concussion. St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
O’Keeffe, M. (2010, October 23). Local expert says NFL, Roger Goodell have ‘moral responsibility’ to protect players from concussions. New York Daily News.
Omalu, B. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Bennet I. Omalu, M.D., co-director, Brain Injury Research Institute, West Virginia University. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Omalu, B. (2010, February 8). Dr. Bennet Omalu’s remarks to the House Judiciary Committee in Houston. Brain Injury Research Institute.
Omalu, B. (2011, January 15). Telephone interview with author.
Omalu, B.I., DeKosky, S.T., Minster, R.L., Kamboh, M.I., Hamilton, R.L., & Wecht, C.H. (2005). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a National Football League player. Neurosurgery, 57(1).
Patel, D.R., Shivdasani, V., & Baker, R.J. (2005). Management of sport-related concussion in young athletes. Sports Medicine, 35(8).
Piland, S.G., Ferrara, M.S., Macciocchi, S.N., Broglio, S.P., & Gould, T.E. (2010). Investigation of baseline self-report concussion symptom scores. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(3).
Protect Heads. (2011, March 27). Rep. Bill Pascrell: ‘Protect soldiers’ heads.’ Newark Star-Ledger.
Randolph, C., McCrea, M., & Barr, W.B. (2005, September). Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion? Journal of Athletic Training, 40(3).
Randolph, C., Barr, W.B., & McCrea, M. (2006, June). Letters to the editor. Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2).
Randolph, C. (2011, January-February). Baseline neuropsychological testing in managing sport-related concussion: Does it modify risk? Current Sports Medicine Reports, 10(1).
Rule change. (2010, November 10). Rule change on youth football hits. The Associated Press.
Schwarz, A. (2010, September 22). Despite law, town finds concussion dangers lurk. New York Times.
Schatz, P. (2010, January). Long-term test-retest reliability of baseline cognitive assessments using ImPACT. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(1).
Schwarz, A. (2011, February 3). Two teams show divide in debate over safety. New York Times.
Schwarz, A. (2011, February 13). Concussion protocols fail Vonn. New York Times.
Screening Limits. (2010, December 3). Football player’s death points to screening limits. The Associated Press.
Shedden, M. (2010, December 28). Concussion concerns are changing football, but it’s still hit and miss. Tampa Tribune.
Shirley, S. (2010, November 14). Area schools should adopt baseline concussion tests. Murfreesboro Daily.
Siegel, A. (2010, December 8). Varied symptoms can result from concussions. Washington Post.
Spar, J. (2011, March 4). Nowinski: Rest a month after concussion. www.weei.com.
Stanmyre, M., & Friedman, J. (2010, January 5). ImPACT testing, an important tool used to evaluate the recovery from brain injuries. Newark Star-Ledger.
Styx, K. (2011, January 19). HHS studying head injuries with use of ImPACT. Hastings Star Gazette.
Suarez, R. (2009, November 27). Hard knocks: Does playing in the NFL cause brain trauma? PBS NewsHour.
Szostak, M. (2011, April 16). Proposals debated to allow sports fees, require baseline concussion testing. Providence Journal.
Talavage, T.M., Nauman, E.A., Breedlove, E.L., Yoruk, U., Dye, A.E., Morigaki, K.M., Feuer, H., Leverenz, L.J. (2010). Functionally-detected cognitive impairment in high school football players without clinically diagnosed concussion. Journal of Neurotrauma.
Tests Key. (2010, November 18). Neurocognitive tests key to assessing concussions. The Associated Press.
Valid, Reliable. (Accessed 2011, January 25). ImPACT: Valid. Reliable. Safe. www.impacttest.com.
Vicious Play. (2010, December 30). Don’t let vicious play tarnish the Super Bowl. Christian Science Monitor.
Wilner, B. (2010, October 20). NFL players wonder what’s happening to sport after league crackdown on hits. The Associated Press.
Wilner, B. (2010, October 28). Some NFL players not sold on how safe game will be if low hits are emphasized. The Associated Press.
Wood, C. (2010, September 7). Congress and concussions, prepping for further litigation. PointOfLaw.com.
Wulf, S. (2010, November 15). Play it safer. ESPN The Magazine, p. 25.
for The Phanatic Magazine
This post is an excerpt preview for a pending analysis on Chaney’s Blog, ‘Brain Trauma Stalks Football Players, Dictates Impact Game Reform,’ which will include independent experts’ recommendations for constructive steps imperative to the sport’s survival at public schools and colleges.
Today’s official effort against gridiron brain trauma recycles the old “safer football” concept.
In the NFL and trickling down to colleges, schools and youth leagues, “behavior modification” of players involves teaching “proper contact,” or “form tackling” as known in 1976. Coaches tell football players to hit without using heads, as if hogs might be taught to fly.
Current purveyors of the theory, led by Chris Nowinski and Dr. Robert Cantu of the Sports Legacy Institute, and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell—who funds the Nowinski nonprofit with $1 million—propose action reminiscent of the plug-in electric football game, with plastic players bumping across the vibrating surface, hooking at shoulders in ring dances.
And that’s only the beginning of hocus-pocus remedy for rampant head injury in American football.
While mysteries are daunting for the problem, like positive diagnosis of concussion, mere clinical intuition guides the varied protocols of diagnosis and judgment for when players are fit to compete again. No random clinical trial of legitimacy has been attempted.
“It is scary,” said Dr. Lester Mayers, concussion researcher of Pace University athletics, who joins experts like Dr. Bennet Omalu in sounding alarm over football’s touting concussion testing, which is parroted by media.
These critics warn football conducts dangerous “concussion management” based on incomplete research for assessing symptoms, and many brain-injured players are prematurely returning to contact, all ages, typically within days.
Indeed, radiology techniques are demonstrating holes in concussion testing, notably of studies at Purdue University, where functional MRI reveals that sub-concussive brain injury in prep players is completely missed by external assessments through computer.
At Purdue, teen football athletes displaying brain injury through diffusion tensor imaging, an fMRI technique, are otherwise registering normal state in the intuitive-grounded baseline tests and monitoring systems of neuropsychology.
Meanwhile, concussion testing takes a thrashing in independent peer review.
Current Sports Medicine Reports recently published another scathing analysis by Christopher Randolph in Chicago, professor of neurology at Loyola University, who details glaring faults in “baseline” testing of hot-selling ImPACT software employed by youth leagues, schools, colleges and pro sports. “The use of baseline neuropsychological testing in the management of sport-related concussion has gained widespread acceptance, largely in the absence of any evidence suggesting that it modifies risk for athletes,” Randolph observes.
Since 2005, Randolph is among reviewers for several journals who find unacceptable rates of false-positive and false-negative results for ImPACT, among popular brain assessments developed and marketed by academics and doctors associated with the NFL and benefiting from the league’s pervasive publicity machine.
“It is a major conflict of interest, scientifically irresponsible,” Randolph told ESPN The Magazine in 2007. “We are trying to get to what the real risks are of sports-related concussion, and you have to wonder why they (NFL experts) are promoting testing. Do they have an agenda to sell more ImPACTS?”
The marketing succeeds, with sales to a thousand schools and hundreds of colleges thus far, and media only increase exposure of ImPACT in the furor over concussions, especially in football.
An overwhelming majority of journalists, politicians, educators and football experts ignore the accumulating evidence rebuking concussion testing as invalid and unreliable, choosing instead to endorse the quick-fix notion and push it for mandate by law.
“With the tools to properly manage concussions and implement safety precautions, parents, coaches and students can change the culture of school sports for the better and keep our students safe on the field and thriving in the classroom,” declared U.S. Rep. George Miller, of California.
Such rhetoric confounds Mayers. “The response is infantile,” he said. “The ImPACT people have taken over the idea that somehow they can tell you when it’s OK that the athlete goes back.”
The engineers and marketers of ImPACT, neuropsychologists Mark R. Lovell and Michael W. Collins in Pittsburgh, did not respond to questions about their product recently forwarded them. Lovell is the former NFL director of NP testing, and his consulting for the Steelers franchise spurred development of ImPACT software. Collins is on the Steelers medical staff and consults for other teams. A third partner in the product is Dr. Joseph Maroon, Steelers neurosurgeon who serves on the NFL committee overseeing concussion management.
“The topic of sport-related concussion has been highly visible in the media over the last few years… and the issue of concussion management in the NFL even has reached the point of Congressional hearings,” Randolph wrote in the January-February edition of Reports. “What consistently is missing from these debates, however, is a rational, empirically-based discussion of the true risks associated with sport-related concussion, the potential for any given management strategy to modify these risks, and the actual evidence that such risk modification can be achieved. In addition, there has been little attention paid to the clinical validity or psychometric characteristics of (computer) baseline tests, despite widespread use of these measures.”
Randolph, characterizing utility of the tool as “clinical guesswork in most cases,” concluded: “It is clear that, to date, the baseline tests used in sport-related concussion management programs lack sufficient clinical validity and reliability for their intended purpose.”
Mayers cites lack of specificity and sensitivity for NP tests on the market. “Basically, they’re all unsuitable for clinical work with concussions,” said Mayers, director of sports medicine for Pace University in New York. “They don’t have the reliability, the accuracy or the validity, the three technical terms for the use of neuro-psych work. They’ll miss 20 to 25 percent of athletes who have concussions, and this has been used by the NFL and the National Hockey League, and the NCAA is considering mandating this.”
Word is that the NCAA will soon require concussion testing of all member schools, with NFL officials and experts behind the push, and Mayers says these factors helped his department adopt computer assessment, posing a dilemma for him.
Mayers authored a 2008 review published by Archives of Neurology, concluding a concussed athlete should be sidelined at least four to six weeks, but he notes football’s current “standard of practice” for brain trauma includes NP testing and fast return to play, so he conformed at Pace. “I really believe four to six weeks (recovery time) is appropriate, but it’s not the standard of community,” he said. “So I could be sued by an athlete I held out for four weeks, if he chose to do so.”
A neurology journal has approved publication of a new Mayers review, which denounces computerized concussion assessment, he said.
More medical voices doubt concussion testing. Dr. Randall Benson, imaging expert and neurologist at Wayne State University, warned Congress last year “that neuropsychology is not an exact science,” a fact echoed by Dr. Jeffrey Kutcher, of Michigan Neurosport, testifying for the same committee. “Relying on protocols is, in my opinion, potentially dangerous, clinical protocols, as they assume that concussions are similar enough to each other to fit a predetermined paradigm,” said Kutcher, who serves on committees for the NFL and American Academy of Neurology.
Last month, lawmakers heard a military concussion test fails miserably. The tool, Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics, “is insensitive and nonspecific,” said Lt. Gen. Eric Schoomaker, surgeon general of the U.S. Army. “It misses about a quarter to a third of (soldiers) who are concussed and includes about 50 percent of (those) not concussed.”
In addition, insurance companies inform the military and some schools that assessments lack scientific vetting and could raise liability stakes for personnel who administer the tests in error.
Dr. Omalu, practitioner of science and law, says concussion testing amounts to “fraud” in the context of accurate, reliable diagnosis, and it can be harmful during initial days following trauma—when most injured athletes, suffering chemical disruption of brain cells, are subjected to mental strain of the programs. The online ImPACT test lasts 20 to 30 minutes and presents memory challenges involving colors, texts and forms.
“ImPACT testing is not a diagnosis tool,” said Omalu, chief medical examiner for San Joaquin County, California, and director of autopsy for the independent Brain Injury Research Institute. “It is a forensic follow-up to monitoring a patient, to evaluate the amount of damage. Using (computerized) testing in the acute phase of injury can actually make the symptoms worse.”
Doctors outside sports medicine would agree, Omalu added, and apparently many who work in athletics, given media reports of concussed youths prescribed isolation with total layoffs ranging from a month to two years.
Dustin Fink, a certified athletic trainer in Illinois, seconds Omalu. Fink discourages computerized testing until a concussed athlete is free of symptoms such as headaches, memory loss and unsteadiness. “I use the NP tests as a baseline to educate the athlete about what some signs and symptoms could become present and as a true baseline when they think that are ready to return,” said Fink, an injury authority whose popular Website, theconcussionblog.com, serves as information clearinghouse.
Fink believes “money grab” drives overuse of concussion testing, and he generally supports Omalu’s publicized stance that longer rest is needed for concussed athletes. At Shelbyville High School, where Fink works, “we are seeing recovery times on the average of 24 days,” he said. “More and more evidence suggests that a 28 to 42-day (layoff) period may be necessary.”
In previous reports on Chaney’s Blog, Omalu has proposed concussed juvenile football players be sidelined at least three months. Omalu says NFL players should rest one to three months with diagnosed concussion, depending on severity and technology for treatment, which he advocates to be functional MRI that isn’t approved by the league.
Only sports in civilian life will quickly return the brain-injured to activity, and a practice of general medicine calls for strict isolation lasting days and longer, involving no stress mentally and physically.
In the military, researcher Craig Bryan, a psychologist and professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center, recently concluded that three days of isolation, removed from sunlight, was optimum for beginning treatment of concussed soldiers.
A neural consultant for the New York Jets once discouraged use of NP testing on a football player until symptoms abated, based on a large NCAA study he’d co-authored, and quickly found himself out of the league.
During a 2004 conference in New York, neuropsychologist Bill Barr remarked that “the research indicated that the best time to do neuropsychological tests on players with concussions was after their symptoms had completely cleared, usually five to 10 days after the trauma,” Peter Keating reported for ESPN in 2006.
Jets physician Dr. Elliot Pellman confronted Barr after the conference, and the neuropsychologist ended up losing both his job with the team and his place in league research. “NFL teams, Barr understood, preferred testing players just one to two days after a concussion, allowing for quicker diagnoses and returns to play,” Keating reported.
Barr, of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at NYU, did not respond to a recent interview request.
Matt Chaney is a journalist, editor, teacher and restaurant worker in Missouri, USA. For more information, including about his 2009 book, Spiral of Denial: Muscle Doping in American Football, visit the homepage at www.fourwallspublishing.com.
References
Alessi, A. (2010, December 17). Telephone interview with author.
Alessi, A. (2011, March 1). NFL labor talks focused on safety. Norwich Bulletin.
Anonymous. (2010, December 27). Player X: Compeition? Player safety? Yeah, right. It’s always about the money. ESPN The Magazine, p. 16.
Bachman, R. (2011, February 12). Concussions, an injury rising among teen athletes, more profound and enduring than previously known. Portland Oregonian.
Benson, R.R. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Randall R. Benson, M.D., assistant professor of neurology, Wayne State University. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Benson, R.R., Meda, S.A., Vasudevan, Z.K, Govindarajan, K.A., Hanks, R.A., Millis, S.R., Makki, M., Latif, Z., Copin, W., Meythaler, J., & Haacke, E.M. (2007, November 3). Global white matter analysis of diffusion tensor images is predictive of injury severity in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 24(3).
Benson, R.R., Gattu, R., Zhifeng, K., Haacke, E.M. (2010, May 1). The use of advanced MR Imaging methods in traumatic brain injury: Development of imaging biomarkers for improving diagnosis, outcome prediction and treatment. Integrated Neuroscience Session, American Academy of Neurology.
Benson, R.R. (2011, January 18). Email to author.
Blount, R. (2011, April 13). Concussion symptoms hard to recognize, treat. Minneapolis Star Tribune.
Brady, E., & Falgoust, J.M. (2011, April 14). Concussions now a hot issue as league toughens policies. USA Today.
Breer, J. (2011, March 25). Expert paints alarming picture of concussions. Southeast Missourian.
Brewin, B. (2011, March 16). Battlefield brain-injury assessment tool has high failure rate. www.nextgov.com.
Briggs, D. (2011, February 27). No messing with the head at MU. Columbia Tribune.
Brix, S. (2011, January 21). Local schools implement concussion testing programs to ensure safety of student athletes. North Shore Sun.
Broglio, S.P., Macciocchi, S.N., Ferrara, M.S. (2007, June). Sensitivity of the concussion assessment battery. Neurosurgery 60(6).
Broglio, S.P., Puetz, T.W. (2008, November 1). The effect of sport concussion on neurocognitive function, self-report symptoms and postural control: A meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 38(1).
Calvin, B.C. (2010, October 12). NFL educating kids about concussions. Sacremento Bee.
Cameron, A. (2011, January 2). Rampant concussions raising big questions on ice. Calgary Herald.
Cantu, R. (2010, December 21). Telephone interview with author.
Charkow, R. (2011, February 21). Battling sport’s concussion crisis: Ex-wrestler’s institute studies brains of deceased athletes to better understand brain trauma. www.cbc.ca.
Cleary, L. (2011, January 26). Concussions remain a gray area. www.nbcwashington.com.
Clover, J., & Wall, J. (2010, January). Return-to-play criteria following sports injury. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 29(1).
College Coaches. (2010, October 29). College coaches: Don’t blame us for helmet hits. Sports Illustrated.
Collins, M.W., Lovell, M.R., McKeag, D.B. (1999). Current issues in managing sports-related concussion. Journal of The American Medical Association, 282(24).
Comper, P., Hutchison, M., Magrys, S., Mainwaring, L., & Richards, D. (2010, October). Evaluating the methodological quality of sports neuropsychology concussion research: A systemic review. Brain Injury, 24(11).
Concussion Law. (2011, March 13). Rep. Gallison, Sen. Felag propose expansion of new student athlete concussion law. www.tiverton.patch.com.
Concussion Tests. (2011, March 6). Panel suggests concussion tests for Butte players. www.ktvq.com.
Conferences Criticized. (2010, February 2). Conferences criticized over concussion policies. The Associated Press.
Deitch, D. (2011, January 17). Poor tackling is the cause of concussions. Delaware County Daily Times.
Doherty, J. (2010, October 18). Concussion test tests patient’s patience. www.nwtimes.com.
Donaldson, A. (2011, January 10). Athletes face tough decision when hurt. Deseret News.
Duff, M. (2009, July 14). Management of sports-related concussion in children and adolescents. ASHA Leader.
Echemendia, R.J., Herring, S., & Bailes, J. (2009). British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43.
Eckner, J.T., Kutcher, J.S. (2010, Jan-Feb). Concussion symptom scales and sideline assessment tools: A critical literature update. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 9(1).
Electric Football. (1970 circa.) Old Coleco Electric Football commercial. www.youtube.com.
Engel, J.F. (2011, February 2). Steelers linebacker cuts through the hypocrisy. Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
Epstein, D. (2011, November 1). The damage done: While concussive hits dominate the debate, a groundbreaking new study suggests that minor blows—and there can be hundreds each game—are just as traumatic. Sports Illustrated.
Epstein, D. (2011, April 13). Unique study explores cumulative effect of hits in high school football. Sports Illustrated.
Evan, F. (2010, November 1). Early warning: Even at PeeWee level, coaches struggle to balance safety concerns with teaching toughness. Sports Illustrated.
Farrey, T. (2010, May 5). Questions vital to diagnosing concussion. ESPN.com.
Fernandes, D. (2010, January 1). Local teams tackling concussions with new technology. Virginian-Pilot.
Finley, D. (2011, April 7). Insomnia linked to post-injury headaches. San Antonio Express-News.
Fitz, G. (2011, April 3). ImPACT tests coming to a high school near you. Nashua Telegraph.
Flinchpaugh, B. (2011, January 24). Fort Zumwalt tackles concussion issue. St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
Football Injuries. (2011, April 13). Youth football injuries on the rise, study finds. Health Day News, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Fronick, A.M. (2010, December 28). ImPACT testing helps athletes safely return to play following concussion. The People’s Tribune.
Galvan, K. (2010, November 18). Mom says school handled son’s injury the wrong way. www.myfoxhouston.com.
Giger, C. (2010, October 28). A big ImPACT: Concussion test aids in precaution. Altoona Mirror.
Goodell Talks. (2010, October 23). Goodell talks about big hits. Scout.com.
Gregory, S. (2010, February 8). Problem with football: Our favorite sport is too dangerous: How to make it safer. Time.
Grindel, S.H., Lovell, M.R., & Collins, M.W. (2001, July). The assessment of sport-related concussion: The evidence behind neuropsychological testing and management. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 11(3).
Guskiewicz, K. (2011, January 8). Telephone interview with author.
Guskiewicz, K.M., McCrea, M., Marshall, S.W., Cantu, R.C., Randolph, C., Barr, W., Onate, J.A., & Kelly, J.P. (2003). The NCAA concussion study: Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players. Journal of The American Medical Association, 290(19).
Hamilton, J. (2011, February 2). Doctors throw flags on high school concussions. www.npr.org.
Haywood, L. (2011, March 7). Diagnostic tests and treatment in traumatic brain injuries. www.access-legal.co.uk.
Head Games. (2010, Summer). Head games: Where sports injury and science connect to understand and prevent a neuro-degenerative disease. Campus & Alumni News, Boston University, p. 9.
Hibbard, M.R. (2011, April 15). Rehab for the brain after traumatic injuries. American Psychological Association.
Hobson, M. (2010, October 27). NFL looking to avoid possible lawsuits stemming from severe player concussions. Vancouver Sun.
Hopper, M. (2009, October 29). Is the NFL too dangerous? Birmingham Weekly.
Hruby, P. (2010, October 22). Future shock: The death of football. ESPN.com.
Huff, D. (1987, January 5). High school deaths, injuries raise questions about safety: Athletes’ medical care may be inadequate. Washington Post, p. C3.
ImPACT Program. (Accessed 2011, January 25). ImPACT concussion evaluation and management program. www.medpsych.net.
ImPACT Reliability. (Accessed 2011, January 14). ImPACT reliability and validity. www.impacttest.com.
ImPACT Works. (2011, January 26). How ImPACT works and what it costs. Suburban Life Publications.
Jackson, N. (2011, January 7). A former player responds to Goodell’s open letter. Deadspin.com.
Jackson, N. (2011, January 24). Telephone interview with author.
Johnson, L.S.M. (2010, October 5). Kids, concussion and ConTACT: The shortcomings of return-to-play guidelines. Neuroethics & Law Blog.
Johnson, L.S.M. (2011, January 13). Email correspondence to author.
Jolly, T. (2010, February 8). Goodell stresses a culture of safety. www.nytimes.com.
Keating, P. (2006, October 24). Doctor yes. ESPN The Magazine.
Keating, P. (2007, August 9). NFL’s concussion expert also sells equipment to the league. ESPN The Magazine.
Keating, P. (2010, December 2). Is concussion testing good enough? ESPN.com.
King, P. (2010, October 17). Brandon Meriweather, James Harrison hits deserve hefty punishment. SportsIllustrated.CNN.com.
King, P. (2010, November 1). Concussions: The hits that are changing football. Sports Illustrated.
Kivela, P. (2010, November 1). Head injuries come to mind. Napa Valley Register.
Klaft, H. (2011, March 20). Effects of concussions go beyond playing field for Western High School student. Jackson Citizen Patriot.
Knight, D. (2010, December 21). Can’t rush recovery. WashingonPost.com.
Koeske, Z. (2010, November 8). Laws aim to protect student athletes with concussions, but money is lagging. PoliticsDaily.com.
Kutcher, J. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Jeffrey Kutcher, M.D., director, Michigan NeuroSport. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Levinthal, D. (2009, September 17). Politicians score significant cash from NFL owners, coaches and players. OpenSecrets.org.
Lovell, M.R. (2006, June). Letters to the editor. Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2).
Lowe, M. (2010, October 14). All-clear after concussion. Portland Press Herald.
Maerlender, A., Flashman, L., Kessler, A., Kumbhani, S., Greenwald, R., Tosteson, T., & McAllister, T. (2010, November-December). Examination the construct validity of ImPACT computerized test, traditional, and experimental neuropsychological measures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(8).
Magliocca, G. (2009, December). Assumption of risk and football. ConcurringOpinions.com.
Maroon, J. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Joseph Maroon, M.D., vice chair, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Martin, M. (2009, October 1). NFL players at risk for dementia. NPR.org.
Mayers, L. (2008, September). Return-to-play criteria after athletic concussion: A need for revision. Archives of Neurology, 65(9).
Mayers, L. (2011, January 31). Telephone interview with author.
McChesney, R. (1989). Media made sport. In Wenner, L.A. (Ed.). Media, sports & society. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
McCollum, D. (2011, April 14). Nac docs tell athletic directors to evaluate concussions. www.ktre.com. style="color:#666666">
McCory, P. (2007, December). Using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut: The modern management of concussions. Injury Prevention, 13(6).
McCrea, M., Guskiewicz, K., Randolph, C., Barr, W.B., Hammeke, T.A., Marshall, S.W., & Kelly, J.P. (2009, November). Effects of a symptom-free waiting period on clinical outcome and risk of reinjury after sport-related concussion. Neurosurgery, 65(5).
McDonald, J. (2010, September 23). Concussion cases hard to figure. ESPNBoston.com.
McKeag, D.B. (2003). Understanding sports-related concussion: Coming into focus but still fuzzy. Journal of The American Medical Association, 290(19).
McKeever, C.K., & Schatz, P. (2003). Current issues in the identification, assessment, and management of concussions in sport. Applied Neuropsychology.
McKenna, D. (2010, October 29). The NFL’s concussion politics. www.washingtoncitypaper.com.
Melchiome, C. (2010, October 30). Test helps schools play it safe with concussions. Philadelphia Inquirer.
Miller, G. (2011, January 31). Rep. George Miller: Lawmakers reintroduce legislation to protect student athletes from concussions. Columbia State.
Moore, A. (2011, March 5). From one hit in basketball practice, months of concussive injury. Lehigh Valley Express-Times.
Muchnick, I. (2011, January 11). Joseph Maroon, doctor for NFL and WWE, has it every which way on concussions. BeyondChron.
Muchnick, I. (2011, January 23). Sports concussion scandal ground zero: NFL and WWE Doc Joseph Maroon’s hype article in ‘Neurosurgery’ on Riddell Football Helmets. wrestlingbabylon.com.
Muchnick, I. (2011, April 18). Will Ritalin become the human growth hormone of sports concussion testing? www.beyondchron.org..
NFL’s Lead. (2010, November 5). Maine high schools follow NFL’s lead. Mobile Maine News.
Olson, E. (2011, January 16). NFL backs state regulations for youth concussion. St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
O’Keeffe, M. (2010, October 23). Local expert says NFL, Roger Goodell have ‘moral responsibility’ to protect players from concussions. New York Daily News.
Omalu, B. (2010, January 4). Testimony of Bennet I. Omalu, M.D., co-director, Brain Injury Research Institute, West Virginia University. In Committee on The Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, (2009, October 28, & 2010, January 4). Legal issues relating to football head injuries, Part I & II, (Serial No. 111-82). Washington, DC: Committee on The Judiciary.
Omalu, B. (2010, February 8). Dr. Bennet Omalu’s remarks to the House Judiciary Committee in Houston. Brain Injury Research Institute.
Omalu, B. (2011, January 15). Telephone interview with author.
Omalu, B.I., DeKosky, S.T., Minster, R.L., Kamboh, M.I., Hamilton, R.L., & Wecht, C.H. (2005). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a National Football League player. Neurosurgery, 57(1).
Patel, D.R., Shivdasani, V., & Baker, R.J. (2005). Management of sport-related concussion in young athletes. Sports Medicine, 35(8).
Piland, S.G., Ferrara, M.S., Macciocchi, S.N., Broglio, S.P., & Gould, T.E. (2010). Investigation of baseline self-report concussion symptom scores. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(3).
Protect Heads. (2011, March 27). Rep. Bill Pascrell: ‘Protect soldiers’ heads.’ Newark Star-Ledger.
Randolph, C., McCrea, M., & Barr, W.B. (2005, September). Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion? Journal of Athletic Training, 40(3).
Randolph, C., Barr, W.B., & McCrea, M. (2006, June). Letters to the editor. Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2).
Randolph, C. (2011, January-February). Baseline neuropsychological testing in managing sport-related concussion: Does it modify risk? Current Sports Medicine Reports, 10(1).
Rule change. (2010, November 10). Rule change on youth football hits. The Associated Press.
Schwarz, A. (2010, September 22). Despite law, town finds concussion dangers lurk. New York Times.
Schatz, P. (2010, January). Long-term test-retest reliability of baseline cognitive assessments using ImPACT. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(1).
Schwarz, A. (2011, February 3). Two teams show divide in debate over safety. New York Times.
Schwarz, A. (2011, February 13). Concussion protocols fail Vonn. New York Times.
Screening Limits. (2010, December 3). Football player’s death points to screening limits. The Associated Press.
Shedden, M. (2010, December 28). Concussion concerns are changing football, but it’s still hit and miss. Tampa Tribune.
Shirley, S. (2010, November 14). Area schools should adopt baseline concussion tests. Murfreesboro Daily.
Siegel, A. (2010, December 8). Varied symptoms can result from concussions. Washington Post.
Spar, J. (2011, March 4). Nowinski: Rest a month after concussion. www.weei.com.
Stanmyre, M., & Friedman, J. (2010, January 5). ImPACT testing, an important tool used to evaluate the recovery from brain injuries. Newark Star-Ledger.
Styx, K. (2011, January 19). HHS studying head injuries with use of ImPACT. Hastings Star Gazette.
Suarez, R. (2009, November 27). Hard knocks: Does playing in the NFL cause brain trauma? PBS NewsHour.
Szostak, M. (2011, April 16). Proposals debated to allow sports fees, require baseline concussion testing. Providence Journal.
Talavage, T.M., Nauman, E.A., Breedlove, E.L., Yoruk, U., Dye, A.E., Morigaki, K.M., Feuer, H., Leverenz, L.J. (2010). Functionally-detected cognitive impairment in high school football players without clinically diagnosed concussion. Journal of Neurotrauma.
Tests Key. (2010, November 18). Neurocognitive tests key to assessing concussions. The Associated Press.
Valid, Reliable. (Accessed 2011, January 25). ImPACT: Valid. Reliable. Safe. www.impacttest.com.
Vicious Play. (2010, December 30). Don’t let vicious play tarnish the Super Bowl. Christian Science Monitor.
Wilner, B. (2010, October 20). NFL players wonder what’s happening to sport after league crackdown on hits. The Associated Press.
Wilner, B. (2010, October 28). Some NFL players not sold on how safe game will be if low hits are emphasized. The Associated Press.
Wood, C. (2010, September 7). Congress and concussions, prepping for further litigation. PointOfLaw.com.
Wulf, S. (2010, November 15). Play it safer. ESPN The Magazine, p. 25.
Labels:
chaney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)