![]() |
Courtesy of the Morning Call |
By Bob Herpen
Phanatic Hockey Editor
On Friday night, the Philadelphia Flyers will select at the No. 6 position in the first round for the first time since 1991, when then general manager Russ Farwell took a gamble on a Swedish prospect who ended up playing all of 100 regular-season games in this city, 11 years after his NHL debut.
Now GM Danny Briere has the chance to pick within the top 10 for the third time in the last four seasons, the first time since Keith Allen was afforded similar luck from 1969 to 1972.
While an overwhelming majority of the talk every year at this time centers on an obsession with prospect profiles, who the Flyers could pick early, I just want to remind you that there’s a bit more at stake beyond the basic scouting leg work. Fifty years since the last Cup and 13 years since the last playoff series win, fan attention and anger should center on the how and the why, NOT the who.
It doesn’t matter whether the pick is Jake O’Brien or Brady Martin from Canadian juniors, James Hagens from Division I U.S. college hockey, the mysterious One-Armed Man or Taro Tsujimoto of the Tokyo Kitanas. It doesn’t even have to be the “right” one touted by scouts or network hacks. It does need to be the “right” one in terms of managing the player’s physical attributes and skill set, with minimal interference or malfeasance in his development.
The acquisition of Trevor Zegras earlier in the week should take some of the pressure off Briere and the braintrust, for a franchise constantly in search of a reliable 1C. But Zegras is a restricted free agent with his 3-year contract at $5.75 million AAV set to expire next July, so there is clear urgency to have an heir apparent or two at the ready.
Yeah, there’s Jett Luchanko in the on-deck circle flush with start-of-year experience for the Flyers bookended by end-of-year experience with the Phantoms, but the cupboard is bare.
The recent history of the organization is flush with examples of offensive-minded skaters who are centers made forwards, forwards made centers, and up-front guys simply left to grow into amoebas, playing whatever, whenever. Scott Laughton and Nick Cousins. Jason Akeson. The dear, departed Morgan Frost. An under-the-gun Owen Tippett.
Maybe one could make an argument that the focus on bulking up defensive prospects in the mid-2010s left a blind spot. That laissez-faire attitude doesn’t cut it anymore for a franchise looking to pull itself out of the doldrums.
It should also make you want to tear your hair out that Briere pulled off the deal with Anaheim to bring in Zegras – who did not respond well to suggestions he should play wing and not his natural center with the Ducks – only to say he “hoped” Zegras could make an impact at center and then publicly punt the decision on his assignment to new head coach Rick Tocchet.
If the Flyers can so brazenly fail to come to a consensus on an established player, what’s to make you think they can’t or won’t pull the old switcheroo with the prospects?
O’Brien is a center. Martin is a center. Hagens is a center. There’s absolutely no reason for Briere et al to start toying with the haul. It may already be too late for Luchanko, a likely Mark Recchi clone who was told in April, as reported by the Inquirer, to be less selfish with the puck. The Flyers never drafting and developing a bona-fide pure goal scorer is another rant for another time.
Obie’s draft profile places him closest to what Sean Couturier could have been if Claude Giroux wasn’t the top dog on the top line. Don’t turn him into an Eric Lindros. Martin’s bona fides read more like a Joe Thornton prototype and, of course, certain outlets are already pinning him to the Lindros mold. No bueno. While through only one season at Boston College, Hagens may resist molding because the organization cannot read what one college season at age 18 means compared to two in juniors, or due to lack of exposure. He is one of BC’s gaggle of young, eager, skilled forwards who need to develop much more edge and resilience.
If the choice is Hagens, he simply cannot be allowed to turn into another James vanRiemsdyk. I still wonder if the front office has learned anything from a decade-plus of wandering through NCAA Division I prospects. If only Ray Shero still walked the Earth.
A refresher:
VanRiemsdyk was taken with the infamous No. 2 selection in the 2007 draft, one behind future Hall-of-Famer Patrick Kane. He spent two seasons flitting around on an Olympic-sized ice rink at the Whittemore Center for the University of New Hampshire. Long-time Wildcats head coach Dick Umile brought in a spate of smaller, quicker, skilled forwards to take advantage of the wider playing surface, but the Snider-Clarke-Holmgren think tank axis did little else than constantly tapping their watches impatiently for two years waiting for JVR to declare his status.
Once loosed on the world in March 2009, the organization immediately tabbed JVR as a power forward, envisioning him mucking down low at even strength and on the power play. Development? How about all of 7 games of pro experience with the Phantoms. He was given a chance to make the NHL roster in camp the following September – which he did – and proceeded to stunt his growth.
Hilarity ensued, including injuries, inconsistency, more front office complaints about on-ice prowess, a 6-year exile to Toronto followed by a 5-year Philly reunion during which JVR *finally* grew and aged into a body which could execute the role the franchise hoped for in the first place.
If we learned anything from the William C. Gauthier fiasco, it’s that Briere might have caused affront to the young upstart in merely suggesting the club didn’t want him to leave after his freshman campaign and burn a year off his entry-level contract. The ironing is delicious given the spate of one-and-done’s coming from the NCAA.
Briere would be wise to take that tack again with Hagens if the club hasn’t had their Eagles-eye view tainted, since he’s not quite the player sprung fully formed from the head of Zeus that Gauthier was.
And besides, if you’ve read or followed me at all over the last 15 years, you know which side of the stay-or-go scenario I favor.
Editor's note: With the 6th overall pick, the Flyers skipped the top D1 prospect in Hagens, choosing Porter Martone -- a right-handed-shooter from the Steelheads of the Ontario Hockey League. The 18-year-old finished his 3rd year of juniors with 98 points (37G, 61A) in 57 games on the wing.
By trading two later first-round picks, they moved up to No. 12 and chose a center, left-handed shooting Jack Nesbitt whose second OHL season yielded 64 points (25G, 39A) for the Windsor Spitfires. The fact the club bucked the trend to take a forward then grabbed a center within the top 15 selections dramatically underscores the point about development that takes into account each player's natural position and skill set, at slots where each player is presumably 1-2 years away from competing for an NHL roster spot.
Can I offer any solutions after all this bleating and babbling? No, save for once again screaming into the void that the Flyers hockey operations just learn from the past and not repeat the same mistakes.
That’s a big enough ask for now. I can also ask the fandom from here on out, to think one or two levels up, to hold those who cover the team and those responsible for the decision making to account.
One man, one position. One solution. One vision. Gimme, gimme, gimme fried chicken.