by Bob Herpen
Phanatic Hockey Editor
Trevor Zegras shook off some early jitters and a mid-season malaise during his first year with the Philadelphia Flyers, eventually posting career highs in goals (26), points (67), power-play scores (10) and equaled a career best with 5 game-winning strikes while shuttling back-and-forth between wing and center.
A fresh start and 10 games’ worth of playoff pressure was apparently what the Boston University product needed, as he told the media during the players’ break-up day on May 12: “Yeah, it was big. For me, having that excitement about the game was great, to find that passion for winning and success as a team was big.”
“I think I had lost a little bit of that,” he added.
Zegras was one of 7 regulars who finished the season 25 years old or younger. One message that was repeated by players, coaches and front office personnel was the advantage of having so many young, close-knit teammates working through the same learning curve.
“We had a close team. It made coming to the rink every day a lot of fun and enjoyable and I think when you enjoy what you’re doing you’re going to find success and that’s kinda what we had as a team this year,” he noted.
That said, if he truly values the atmosphere in Philadelphia and valued his experience in a higher-pressure but youth-friendly locker room compared to Anaheim, his seventh NHL campaign and second here should be locked in on improving his numbers with more consistency.
Of course, there are two concurrent methods to accomplish this: personal improvement as well as more consistent line pairings and better defined roles initiated by the coaching staff.
Zegras put together two lengthy point streaks in the regular season: a 9-gamer from Dec. 9 through Dec. 23 (5G, 6A) and a 7-gamer from March 21 through Apr. 2 (1G, 6A). He also collected 15 points over the final 13 contests.
But the start to his first Flyers’ season was tentative, with just 5 helpers in the club’s first 6 games. It took a near-career threatening incident on Oct. 23 in Ottawa when Sens forward Tim Stutzle came within inches of slashing his exposed wrist, before things kicked into gear.
After that, the first flash of brilliance arrived as he connected for 14 points (6G, 8A) in his next 10 outings. Then, a pit that lasted pretty much for two months followed by the refresh offered after the Olympics and the infusion of fresh offense from key prospects.
True Stats Behind the Snipers
While being shuttled back and forth at will between wing and center, Zegras totaled a career high 26 goals on 167 shots on goal for a 15.6% shooting percentage – second only to Travis Konecny (16.1%) among Flyers who played close to a full season.
Even if that doesn’t sound impressive, he’s in rare company. Here’s a list of the players who scored at least 25 goals for Flyers over the last decade in a full, uninterrupted season, their total SOG and shooting percentages:
2016-17: Wayne Simmonds 31G/224SOG/13.8%
Brayden Schenn 25G/178SOG/14.0%
2017-18: Claude Giroux 34G/193SOG/17.6%
2018-19: Sean Couturier 33G/223SOG/14.8%
James van Riemsdyk 27G/167SOG/16.2%
2022-23: Travis Konecny 31G/191SOG/16/2%
Owen Tippett 27G/231SOG/11.7%
2023-24: TK 33G/244SOG/13.5%
Tippett 28G/289SOG/9.7%
2024-25: Matvei Michkov 26G/200SOG/13.0%
Tyson Foerster 25G/142SOG/17.6%
When compiling the ideas and stats for this column, I arbitrarily came up with the idea that a true goal scorer – whether currently employed by the Flyers or forever just out of reach – should have a full-season shooting percentage close to or over 20%. Research proved this to be an overshoot.
The last Flyers forward to hit these exact parameters was Danny Briere, whose 2008-09 season was cut short due to a concussion after 11G in 29 games, with his 54 SOG resulting in a 20.4% pct.
You’ll have to go back 25 years to find the last Orange & Black forward to score at least 20 goals and hit close to or over 20% over a full, uninterrupted season – Keith Primeau in 2000-01, when he led the club with a 34G/165SOG/20.6% split. Before that, Eric Lindros did it twice in a row over his first 2 NHL seasons: 1992-93 (41G/180SOG/22.8%) and 1993-94 (44G/197SOG/22.3%).
That’s right. Everybody’s archetype, Johnny Vermont himself, never came close to a 20% success rate despite five full seasons of 51,50,51,43 and 40 goals from 1995-2000.
Going further back, in 1988-89 alone, the Flyers had 3 players: Tim Kerr 48G/236SOG/20.3%; Rick Tocchet 45G/220SOG/20.5%; Ron Sutter 22G/106SOG/24.5%, but that was in an era when stopping 90% of all shots put goaltenders in superstar conversations.
Future Tense
One of the unintended consequences of head coach Rick Tocchet’s defensive system is that shots on goal are at a premium on the attack; this clearly won’t favor Zegras no matter where he plays or with whom.
A glance at Zegras' season log finds the greatest concentrations of multi-shot games came before Tyson Foerster’s arm injury in early December and after Alex Bump was recalled from Allentown in early March.
You would think that fewer shots per game and per season on a top-six player’s ledger would indicate better shooting acumen, but Zegras was one of the drivers of offense who had fingers pointed at his direction for choosing not to shoot more times than many of us cared to count.
Again, on break-up day, Zegras hinted this might not have been a technical flaw, indicating early conversations with Tocchet revolved around ways to become “a more complete player.”
“That was definitely something me and ‘Tocc’ talked about before the year and I think my goal and mindset was just to come in and be coachable and wherever they wanted me to play,” he admitted. “Just do my best and listen to what the people around me are saying.”
Although he produced five games of 6 shots or more, including three games of 7 SOG – one of which came after the Olympic break – Zegras totaled an incredible 58 instances of either no shots, 1 shot or 2 shots in any game last season. That’s just unacceptable whatever the circumstances. I’d imagine Tocchet’s definition of “complete player” also equals more consistent player.
It’s great Zegras publicly claimed his coachability. It’s great he said he was “fine” playing both wing and center and that center provides more room to play and more room to think. The rest of the issue falls on the coaching staff and their in-game as well as game-to-game adjustments and deployment.
At the very least, Zegras is forced to play any contest with at least three basic mindsets: what to do as a center, what to do on the wing, what to do on the power play. Subdivide those three into however many game-action situations result from game play and it can be a lot for any young player to absorb and execute in real time.
This strikes at the very heart of my repeated complaints about the organization, through multiple front office and coaching regimes, routinely treating forwards like amoebas, rather than creating specific roles suited best for each player. No wonder he’s hesitant to shoot or may not be able to find the space; messages and responsibilities in situational play have to scramble his brains.
Driving play means more than puck possession and puck direction. His skating is fluid and quick. Zegras need only look as far as Bump and Porter Martone for how to generate more shots, but probably needs a nod or a pat on the back from the bench to encourage more freelancing.
The gift of youth only lasts so long. Coaching tenures only last so long. Messaging becomes jumbled and mental exhaustion can often precede physical exhaustion. That’s more than enough reason for Briere to snag a true 1C this offseason, at least locking Zegras’ responsibilities in place.
Short of a trade or free agent, isn’t that what they invested $25M on Christian Dvorak for?







